Poorly Defined Land Rights Increase Deforestation Rates

Tropical Deforestation Amazon Brazil

Tropical deforestation. Credit: Amazônia Real from Manaus AM, Brasil, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Poorly defined land rights increase deforestation, but private land rights must be combined with strict environmental policies.

Tropical deforestation causes widespread degradation of biodiversity and carbon stocks. Researchers were now able to test the relationship between land tenure and deforestation rates in Brazil. Their findings show that poorly defined land rights go hand in hand with increased deforestation rates. The study, by researchers from the German Center of Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) and Leipzig University, was published today (October 1) in the journal Nature Communications. Privatizing these lands, as is often promoted in the tropics, can only mitigate this effect if they go hand in hand with strict environmental policies.

Brazilian forestlands harbor the world’s largest biodiversity and carbon stores. However, increasing pressure from ambitious agroeconomic development leads to widespread deforestation. Land tenure governs how and by whom land can be used. Therefore, specific land-tenure changes such as privatizing lands or placing them under environmental protection can have significant implications for forests.

Researchers from iDiv and Leipzig University have now analyzed 33 years (1985-2018) of agriculture-driven deforestation across Brazilian forestlands. With the help of property-level data, they were able to compare six land-tenure regimes (undesignated/untitled, private, strictly protected and sustainable-use protected areas, indigenous, and “quilombola” lands held by Afro-Brazilian communities) and to draw conclusions on how these regimes affect deforestation.

Lands with poorly defined tenure rights increase deforestation

Publicly owned lands with poorly defined tenure rights clearly and consistently increased deforestation compared to all other alternatives. These lands that are neither titled nor designated for any specific use, but may be inhabited by rural settlers with little-to-no guaranteed property rights, account for almost one hundred million hectares in Brazil.

“High deforestation rates in these lands may have many reasons,” explains first author Andrea Pacheco. She is a former researcher at iDiv and now works at the University of Bonn. “For example, the government may simply not have the capacity to effectively monitor on-the-ground deforestation in these lands, resulting in limited enforcement of illegal deforestation here. This, in turn, can attract speculators who clear forest to later claim use rights. Alternatively, poor landless settlers may feel forced to illegally clear these lands for agriculture, if prices on legal land markets are too high for them.”

“This is why land-tenure interventions on these lands are so important. Our study shows that whatever alternative tenure regime with well-defined rights and regulations is implemented, it would likely help reduce this deforestation,” adds last author Dr. Carsten Meyer from iDiv and Leipzig University.

Private regimes can be effective if associated with strict environmental policy

“Privatizing undesignated and untitled lands can be highly effective as a means to reduce deforestation, but only under certain conditions and if associated with strict environmental policies. If this is not the case, deforestation may actually increase,” warns Carsten Meyer. One example of such environmental policies is the Forest Code in the Amazon, which requires landowners to maintain 80% of their land under native vegetation.

However, across very different contexts, private regimes tend to decrease deforestation less effectively and less reliably than alternative well-defined regimes. The researchers showed that both strictly protected areas and sustainable-use protected areas most reliably reduced deforestation rates across Brazil.

They also showed that the effects of tenure held by indigenous peoples and local communities (IPLCs) were dependent on the context. Nonetheless, privatizing IPLC lands would likely increase the risk of deforestation across Brazil. “As much of the world’s remaining forestlands are in IPLC lands, taking local contexts into account will be essential for designing policies with synergies for both biodiversity conservation and IPLCs,” says Andrea Pacheco.

The imperative need for policies that tackle undefined and private lands

Against the backdrop of the ongoing political debate in Brazil around land privatization and protection in tropical landscapes, this study can be used to envisage policy aligned with sustainable development goals. The results show that, first and foremost, interventions in undesignated/untitled lands should be at the forefront of land-related policies in Brazil. In addition, coupling private lands with strict environmental policies has the potential to protect biodiversity in places like the Cerrado or Pantanal, where most of Brazil’s remaining forestlands are private.

Reference: “Land tenure drives Brazil’s deforestation rates across socio-environmental contexts” 1 October 2022, Nature Communications.
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33398-3

Funding: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Note: This article have been indexed to our site. We do not claim legitimacy, ownership or copyright of any of the content above. To see the article at original source Click Here

Related Posts
How to Force Bulbs Indoors During the Winter thumbnail

How to Force Bulbs Indoors During the Winter

Photo: Lushchikov Valeriy (Shutterstock)Seeing some green poking through the snow or cold, winter ground is one of the most visible signs of spring. But seeing how we’re not even a month into winter, it’ll take some time before that happens. Unless, of course, you’ve been growing bulbs inside.The official term for that is “forcing” bulbs,…
Read More
AI turned a Rembrandt masterpiece into 5.6 terabytes of data thumbnail

AI turned a Rembrandt masterpiece into 5.6 terabytes of data

What’s better than enjoying an ingenious piece of art in person? Seeing it at 717,000,000,000 pixels on a smartphone or computer screen. Okay, that might not be completely true—but it’s certainly a distinctive experience, and one that we can thank state-of-the-art technology for. Last week the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam posted an AI-constructed, ultra-high-res image of…
Read More
ANA、元エアアジア仕様最後のA320離日 180席仕様のJA03VA thumbnail

ANA、元エアアジア仕様最後のA320離日 180席仕様のJA03VA

By Tadayuki YOSHIKAWA  ANAホールディングス(ANAHD、9202)傘下の全日本空輸(ANA/NH)が運航していたエアバスA320型機のうち、同じく傘下でLCCのバニラエア(ピーチ・アビエーションと統合)の3号機として運航していた機体(A320ceo、登録記号JA03VA)が1月14日午後に羽田空港からフェリーフライトのNH9432便として日本を離れ、ソウル(仁川)経由でロシア・シベリアのノボシビルスクへ向かった。ANAグループが運航するA320のうち、ANA本体のものはすべて新型エンジンを搭載するA320neoとなり、従来型のA320ceoはピーチ・アビエーション(APJ/MM)の機体のみとなった。 羽田空港に駐機中のANAのA320 JA03VA=21年12月29日 PHOTO: Tadayuki YOSHIKAWA/Aviation Wire  バニラは同じくANAHD傘下のLCCであるピーチと2019年11月に統合を完了。1クラス180席仕様のA320を15機運航していたが、このうち初期導入のJA01VAからJA03VAまでの3機はピーチへ移管されず、180席のまま「32G」と呼ばれる客室仕様で、ANAが2020年から主に単独路線で運航した。  3機はANAHDがリース導入し、バニラが運航。いずれもANAHDが合弁を解消したエアアジア・ジャパン用の機材として発注していたため、シートにロゴが入っていないことなどを除くとエアアジア仕様のままで、翼端に燃費を改善する「シャークレット」を装備していた。薄型シートが主流の中、肉厚なシートは異彩を放っていたが、シートピッチが狭いことがFSC(フルサービス航空会社)の機材としては難点とも言えた。  JA01VAは発注途中でバニラ機になったため、塗装が間に合わず2013年11月14日に白い塗装で成田空港へ飛来。国内で黄色と白のツートンカラーに塗装された。一方、JA02VAとJA03VAはツートンには塗装されず、白地にロゴなどを描くだけのデザインになった。バニラはJA04VAから自社で選定したシートや内装の機材になった。  ANAの国内線用A320は2クラス166席仕様だったが、座席数を統一するためには配線などを変更する必要があり、改修には2年程度かかることから、3機とも180席仕様のまま運航を続けた。 奄美を出発するバニラの成田行きJW824便最終便=19年8月31日 PHOTO: Yusuke KOHASE/Aviation Wire  JA03VAは2014年1月に引き渡された機体で、航空機の位置情報を提供するウェブサイト「フライトレーダー24(Flightradar24)」によると、バニラ時代の最終便は2019年10月23日の台北(桃園)発成田行きJW100便。ANAでは2020年2月6日の羽田発徳島行きNH285便が初便となり、2021年5月30日の八丈島発羽田行きNH1892便が最終便となった。バニラでは、単独路線だった成田-奄美大島線の同社運航最終便となった2019年8月31日の成田行きJW824便にも使用された。  2013年11月に引き渡されたJA01VAの最終便は、2021年3月18日の八丈島発羽田行きNH1892便、2013年12月引き渡しのJA02VAは同月8日の同じ便で退役しており、日本を離れたのはJA01VAが同年11月13日、JA02VAは12月23日だった。  JA01VAは羽田からソウル、ノボシビルスク、ロシア・モスクワのドモジェドボ国際空港経由でフランスのタルブ・ルルド。ピレネー空港へフェリー(回航)された。JA02VAは、米LCCのアレジアント航空(AAY/G4)の塗装で羽田からアンカレッジ経由で米フロリダ州のメルボルン国際空港へ向かった。  ANA本体が運航するA320ファミリーは、国際線機材のA320neo(2クラス146席)と、国内線機材のA321ceoとA321neo(ともに2クラス194席)となる。新型コロナウイルス感染症(COVID-19)の影響で、A320neoは国内線に投入する機会が増えている。 *写真は10枚。羽田空港に駐機中のANAのA320 JA03VA=21年12月29日 PHOTO: Tadayuki YOSHIKAWA/Aviation Wire 奄美を離陸するバニラの成田行きJW824便最終便=19年8月31日 PHOTO: Yusuke KOHASE/Aviation Wire 羽田空港の407番スポットで出発を待つANAのA320 JA03VA=20年10月5日 PHOTO: Tadayuki YOSHIKAWA/Aviation Wire 羽田空港の407番スポットで出発を待つANAのA320 JA03VA=20年10月5日 PHOTO: Tadayuki YOSHIKAWA/Aviation Wire エアアジア・ジャパン仕様のシートのまま運航を続けたANAのA320 JA03VA=20年10月5日 PHOTO: Tadayuki YOSHIKAWA/Aviation Wire 「32G」と書かれたANAのA320 JA03VAの安全のしおり=20年10月5日 PHOTO:…
Read More
Index Of News
Total
0
Share