Kill the Travel Bug: The Case for Staying Put

Not that long ago, air travel was a badge of distinction. The jet set prided itself on the habit, and Frank Sinatra sang “Come Fly with Me” to encourage them further. Mile-high sex on a plane was de rigueur. People actually used to dress up to take a plane (before getting naked in the lavatories). Pan Am claimed, “The travail has been taken out of travel.” For some, the excitement still lingers. One blogger, in the rarefied world of airline fandom, flew himself and his wife from Houston to Frankfurt just to try out United Airlines’ new business-class perks. “This flight was also special,” he enthused, “because my wife . . . would become a United Million Miler. I can think of worse ways to celebrate.” I can’t.

You’d think the joy of flying a million miles on a plane would be over by now for most people, especially since the advent of COVID-19, with long plane rides a great way to catch and carry it. But, apparently, people still miss flying. During the early days of the pandemic, some diehard would-be travellers visited Taiwan’s locked-down airport just to experience the sheer thrill of going through security and wandering the departure lounge: fake checking-in, fake passport control, fake luggage screening, fake duty-free shopping, fake airplane, fake flight attendants. They didn’t fly anywhere. Incredibly, these fanatics were really missing the whole airport experience. Nostalgia for trains I can understand. But airplanes?

Airlines ought to have Jerk of the Year awards, not just for the passengers but for their own employees. If they can’t bump you off the manifest just by yelling at you, next thing you know, you’re bodily kicked out of the plane. On a Hawaii-to-LA flight, Delta recruited airport police to threaten a couple with jail and the confiscation of their children merely for refusing to give up a seat they’d booked and paid for.

Airports and airlines seem very exacting about how passengers behave. They make you wander miles of shops, starve you, bore you, intoxicate you, hassle you, despise you, and then pillory you for “air rage.” More and more passengers do threaten to shoot everybody or leave the plane mid-flight. Some complain about sitting next to fat people or start eating their own mobile phones as a form of protest.

But the sight, in 2017, of the tactics used against David Dao on a United Chicago-to-Louisville flight provoked lasting outrage. The airline had apparently overbooked the flight, as they frequently do. A doctor and legitimate ticket holder with patients to see the next day, Dao declined to give up his seat. As a result, he was dragged off the plane by force, bleeding, half conscious, half naked, in front of fellow passengers. He was left with a broken nose, a concussion, and two lost teeth.

Originally from Vietnam, Dao said the experience was more horrifying than the fall of Saigon. United’s CEO, who defined his staff’s violent approach as merely “re-accommodating” people and unconvincingly described Dao as “disruptive and belligerent,” had to perform some pretty tricky manoeuvres to steer the airline out of its self-inflicted PR nosedive. But even he couldn’t censor all the new slogans: “United: putting the hospital back into hospitality”; “Fly the unfriendly skies”; “Red eye and black eye flights available”; “Board as a doctor, leave as a patient”; “If we can’t seat you, we beat you.”

But, okay, let’s say you survive the invasive full-body scan as well as the obligatory two-to-three-hour duty-free dwalm in the departure area. Let’s go crazy and suppose you make it to your seat on the plane without being publicly shamed or socked in the jaw, either by airline staff or the people sitting near you. Your reward is that now you must fly.

During the cramped, airless, comfortless journey that follows (for which more and more wondrously you have to pay), amid air contaminated by engine oil and the pesticides used in fumigating the plane, a martyr to the airline’s idea of water, alcohol, snacks, and movies, you will also be at risk of congestion, constipation, nausea, dizziness, headaches, hypoxia, jet lag, deep vein thrombosis, solar flares, fleas, pandemics, colds, flu, flatulence, and whooping cough. No one ever seems to voluntarily delay a flight because of illness, even if it’s COVID-19. No, they tramp onboard in service to their microbes and cough, sniff, and exude contaminants all over you for hours on end.

I’m not saying your seat is small, but if it were a haystack, you’d find the needle. While the business-class swells chow down on their business-class lunches in their business-class lounges at the airport and, once on board, guzzle their business-class suppers, encased in their big-assed business-class thrones, making big-ass business-class deals and getting business-class grease from their business-class filets mignons all over the business-class upholstery, the economy passengers’ food, if it ever arrives, is a throwback to the TV dinners of the 1960s. I once ordered the kosher meal just to see if it was any more palatable. The stewardess unceremoniously flung a solid block of ice labelled “kosher” on to my tray table. Inside it, you could dimly see some kishkes. It might have thawed by the time we reached Patagonia, but I wasn’t going to Patagonia.

A global pandemic could reasonably be an opportunity to reconsider the whole crazy business of zooming about the globe like this, but instead, loads of people are itching to jump on board again as soon as it’s allowed—and daring others to do the same. Less for the pleasure of flying or even vacationing, perhaps, than for that of exciting the customary envy in friends and colleagues by temporarily depositing one’s pallid frame on a foreign beach.

Travel is now such a habit that people just can’t imagine life without these regular culture-shocking transplantations. They risk death, disease, penury, language barriers, and bedbugs to not exactly “find themselves” but at least find themselves in a new time zone. Do they think it’s actual time travel?

As COVID-19 has proven, most people don’t really need to go on business trips or see every friend or enemy in person all the time. We have Zoom, and Zoom backgrounds, and Zoom cat filters, for that. We have books too. Books on travel, which could save you a trip. You don’t have to see the seven wonders of the world or visit geographically distant family members. No need to fly around the globe to attend football matches either—cardboard fans can do that for you now. So, why all this dumb transporting of our vulnerable bodies from place to place at the expense of our nerves, our sanity, our health, our time, our bank balances, and the environment?

I have no objection to purposeful uses of travel, of course, as in the cases of emergency workers, international election monitors, refugees, or political, economic, or environmental migrants. Seeking a safe haven is a human right and unavoidable amid war, injustice, and climate change. It’s also beneficial to the host society: as Fran Lebowitz said about New York City, “Immigrants make the culture and tourists ruin it.” So, though travel’s no picnic, let the nomads, grape harvesters, sheep shearers, job seekers, asylum seekers, detainees, adventurers, artists, earthquake sniffer dogs, and St. Bernards with their little casks of brandy go wherever they need to go. My beef is with frivolous travel of the selfish kind, the act of inflicting yourself, uninvited, on other cultures, this constant movement to and fro of the chronically rich, with their taster menus of destinations to which they’re attracted purely due to their own lack of direction, humility, and self-knowledge.

Because all anyone gets out of this passing acquaintance with foreign lands is a crushing conformism, an expensive revitalization of arrogance, and the obtusest form of worldliness, wherein the same banalities are repeated the world over: the same slang, same pop music, same video games, same crummy hotel decor, same fast food, same views of Notre Dame, same big wheels, same terrorist atrocities, same jogging trails. Travel kills as much knowledge, taste, and culture as it purportedly spreads. The compulsion for sameness has an insidious effect: languages, dialects, accents, and national costumes start to die out as soon as the Coke and jeans and T-shirts arrive. To ensure uniformity and reduce the chance that the traveller will actually experience something new, major cities now offer exactly the same chain hotels, restaurants, and designer stores—ideal receptacles for morons on the move. But, if Prada, Superdry, and H&M are everywhere, what’s the point of city-hopping shopping? Prague, Dublin, London, and Barcelona are now completely interchangeable.

Edinburgh, where I live, used to be a fine old mirthless town, grim, austere, dirty, and dignified. Twenty-first-century marketers have turned it into a fairground. Whenever possible, the city’s few green spaces get trashed by amusement arcades, Glühwein, vomit, festivals, fringe festivals, markets, fringe markets, outdoor exhibitions and exhibitionists, coffee bars, beer tents, merry-go-rounds, tat stalls, and ice-skating rinks. The pavements are falling to pieces, the parks and trees are in a state of collapse, the trash is never collected, and the lockdown puppy poop is never scooped. Homeless people died on the streets while the Edinburgh International Festival conducted its annual month-long experiment in overpopulation and overpricing. The fireworks displays alone used to be relentless, daily in August. Occasionally there were wee calls from residents for silent fireworks, but their requests couldn’t be heard over the din.

This historic city, once home to the Scottish Enlightenment, has been intentionally emptied of thought and refilled with fake fun. Edinburgh has reinvented itself by obliterating its own inventiveness.

We could just stay home and listen to Scarlatti, but no, people are bombarded with bucket lists of faraway things they must accomplish, and they fall for it! Lambing in Maine; prancing through Croatian lavender fields; pottering round the Pyramids; personally inspecting the coral reefs and rainforests before they are no more (thanks to all the people who flew out to see them); riding on a donkey, a dromedary, a double-decker; trotting through Central Park in an anachronistic open carriage. A hot dog here, couscous there, sashimi up, tortellini down, Figaro su, Figaro giu, always seeking some remnant—any will do—of uniqueness and authenticity in a world the human race is racing to destroy.

Aviation accounts for 3.5 percent of global warming. The effects of cement production are far worse, I’m told. But 3.5 percent is not nothing. And cement is probably more lastingly useful than the obligatory Mediterranean swim, New Zealand cider tasting, or yet another Thanksgiving with the aging parents. But we continue to prioritize human mobility and interaction over all other considerations, even plague. Meanwhile, the Great Barrier Reef dies for us. It’s lost half its corals in the last twenty-five years and is 80 percent bleached already, cooked alive.

Animals bear the brunt of our allegiance to travel, and not just in the effects of global warming on wildlife. We now inflict travel on animals themselves, from the meat industry’s cruel live-animal transport operation to the way day-old chicks and exotic pets are mailed around the world. Then there are the doomed personal encounters with animals when on holiday. A young sniffer dog was shot dead at Auckland Airport, in New Zealand, in 2017, just for capering around loose and delaying a few flights. Birds, being a danger to airplane engines, are routinely shot or poisoned in the vicinity of airports. Donkeys get the worst of it. In Santorini, waves of Americans pour off cruise ships in hopes of finding a horse or donkey to take them up the hill. Many animals have been injured coping with this onslaught.

But you simply must see the Taj Mahal, or Machu Picchu, or Outer Mongolia, before you peg out, we’re told again and again and again. All exotic places must be trampled. Immediately. It torments people to think of leaving a single foreign banquette unwarmed. Just mention the Galapagos or the Faroe Islands and watch them jump—because they’ ve got to get there before everyone else. Before it’s ruined. The seagrass meadows of the oceans are disappearing at the rate of two football fields an hour just so people can boast about having bothered a turtle in some distant clime.

The truth is you don’t personally have to survey every square inch on earth, no matter what your so-called friends tell you or what you read in newspaper and magazine travel porn. After all, the only really interesting thing about travel is seeing new flora and fauna, and we’ve killed off most of that. What is more important, in the end, than listening to Bach or reading Dickens? Humankind should be your business, not this hypnotic globe-trotting.

The full COVID-19 lockdown in the UK in the spring of 2020 did have one heartening effect: an almost instantaneous burst of wildlife. Birds sang more—for once, they could hear one another. Plants seemed to grow more vigorously, with better air and no one outside to trim or trample them. Weeds blossomed boisterously. Streets were calm and quiet.

In Hong Kong, within a week of the cancellation of the usual 200 express ferries to Macau, native dolphins returned in great numbers. They played in the water and apparently had lots of sex. Dolphins really know how to live—if only we’d let them. There is beauty in less activity, less financial transaction, less mayhem, less frenzy, less movement.

The virus likes cars, restaurants, concerts, parties, airports, globalism, poverty, superspreader get-togethers, close contact, coughing, panting, yelling, physical contretemps, and a catastrophically diminished environment. COVID-19 loves travel and really gets around. It thrives on apathy—ours and that of our lethargic and asinine leaders. Let’s thwart it by beefing up what the virus hates: community, quiet, carefulness, consideration, stasis, solitude, clean air, masks, peace, conservation, the common good, and individual commitment to a single locale. Staying put. Maybe what we need is an intervention: just put travel addicts on a low-mileage diet or make them go cold turkey. If they need ongoing support, they can join Carboniferous Anonymous, a twelve-step program I just made up for people stuck on burning up all the fossil fuels.

It will be hard to stick to your resolve at first, especially when you see your friends scoring their usual peregrination points. You may even be shunned for not putting yourself through several long-haul flights a year, not catching the usual half a dozen colds, and not knowing the best coastal bus route in Honolulu (Number 55). Don’t listen to them. Sticks and stones will break your bones, but travel buffs will never hurt you. And donkeys will be grateful.

Adapted with permission from Things Are Against Us by Lucy Ellmann (Biblioasis, September 2021).

Lucy Ellmann

Lucy Ellmann has written seven novels, including Sweet Desserts, Ducks, Newburyport, and an illustrated book for adults called Tom the Obscure. Things Are Against Us is her first essay collection.

Like What You’re Reading?

Fact-based journalism is our passion and your right.

We’re asking readers like you to support The Walrus so we can continue to lead the Canadian conversation.

With COVID-19, now more than ever The Walrus’ journalism, fact checking, and online events play a critical role in informing and connecting people. From public health to education to the economy, this pandemic presents an opportunity to change things for the better.

We feature Canadian voices and expertise on stories that travel beyond our shores, and we firmly believe that this reporting can change the world around us. The Walrus covers it all with originality, depth, and thoughtfulness, bringing diverse perspectives to bear on essential conversations while setting the highest bar for fact-checking and rigour.

None of this would be possible without you.

As a nonprofit, we work hard to keep our costs low and our team lean, but this is a model that requires individual support to pay our contributors fairly and maintain the strength of our independent coverage.
Donations of $20 or more will receive a charitable tax receipt.

Every contribution makes a difference.
Support The Walrus today. Thank you.

Note: This article have been indexed to our site. We do not claim legitimacy, ownership or copyright of any of the content above. To see the article at original source Click Here

Related Posts
Another increase in the percentage of positive samples for COVID-19 in our country thumbnail

Another increase in the percentage of positive samples for COVID-19 in our country

Броят на новите случаи на коронавирус намаля като абсолютно число, но се увеличи като процент. 513 са новооткритите случаи за 3 октомври, като те бележат спад със 713 на дневна база, след като в събота откритите случаи бяха 1228. Направени са 4603 теста (PCR и антигенни) т.е. със 6902 по-малко спрямо отчетените 11 505 ден по-рано. Така процентът…
Read More
Concerned about the risk of independent registration, the CUHK Student Union was disbanded and the school cut its seats in February. Today, it regrets that the student representatives of the 25 committee continue to be suspicious. thumbnail

Concerned about the risk of independent registration, the CUHK Student Union was disbanded and the school cut its seats in February. Today, it regrets that the student representatives of the 25 committee continue to be suspicious.

明報記者中大昨發聲明稱,在學生會依法成立及運作的大前提下,大學一直樂意與學生會合作,按社團條例或公司條例註冊是學生會合法而有效持續運作之最可行方式,校方對該會決定主動解散感遺憾。中大學生會前副會長馮家強批評校方的聲明是「貓哭老鼠假慈悲」,「一直以來學校與學生相處應互諒互讓,但現在(校方)則破壞員生共治精神,如何再重建雙方信任?」上月聯席會議接納代表會總辭學生會:獨立註冊與否陷兩難中大2月底與學生會割席,要求其獨立註冊成社團或公司,學生會對有關問題一直未有定案。中大學生會昨日在網上發表聲明稱,雖然一直以來與校方關係時有張弛,但兩者仍有溝通,「即使在風雨飄搖的日子,校方依然承認學生會在校內合法地位」;然而今年2月起校方要求其獨立註冊,自行承擔法律責任,面對註冊與否的兩難,為學生最大利益着想,該會上月10日召開聯席會議,接納代表會總辭及解散學生會之議案。學生報指屬停運:解散須學生公投中大學生報昨晚稱,聯席會議通過的議案是指「學生會即時停止運作」,而非解散。學生報又引述校方稱「由於學生會已解散,之前屬學生組織的地方應交還大學」。該報認為「『解散』一詞帶來了實際威脅」,而學生會解散關乎全體中大學生利益,須以全民投票方式決定。據了解,學生會曾評估作公司註冊,認為其無法應付作為公司的財務要求。至於申請成社團方面,該會考慮到警方有權反對申請,而向警方遞交以往學生會文件申請註冊,或對該會有風險;同時校方曾向該會暗示倘不註冊,學生會形同「非法社團」。據悉對解散一事,學生會內有分歧。戶口涉學生報校園電台撥款 校方管理至於學生會代表會屬下院系會、學會的運作,據了解有關屬會自行收取會費,故學生會解散不影響它們的財政,惟中大學生報及校園電台支出由學生會撥款。學生會財政戶口據悉由校方管理,該會須得大學授權才可動用款項。根據《香港中文大學條例》,學生會會長是中大教務會成員之一。另外,中大至少25個校務委員會設學生代表,學生代表由學生會幹事會招募及遴選,再經代表會通過人選並確認委任。中大校方昨稱,學生代表制度及學生參與是大學生活不可或缺一部分,過渡期間學生事務處將處理以往由學生會負責的相關服務。校方沒有回應如何處理不同委員會的學生代表席位問題。中大學生會前副會長馮家強稱,過往學生會凝聚不少學生力量,但近年政府對大專院校學生組織採取打壓手段,擔心失去中大學生會後,日後難以凝聚學生。周保松:會章無解散條文中大學生會解散安排惹起爭議,曾任中大學生報主編的中大學者周保松昨晚在facebook發文稱,學生會要自行解體,壓力之大可想而知,真正責任誰屬顯而易見,惟中大學生會會章沒有關於解散的條文,「換言之,在現有《會章》下,學生會轄下機構沒有任何『合憲』的理由解散學生會」。他說在沒有嘗試舉行全民大會及全民投票下,學生會解散「於理於法不合」。■明報報料熱線﹕inews@mingpao.com/ 9181 4676
Read More
Seychelles: Nature Seychelles Goes High-Tech With Huawei On Cousin Island thumbnail

Seychelles: Nature Seychelles Goes High-Tech With Huawei On Cousin Island

One of the world's leading providers of information and communication technology company, Huawei Technologies, is supporting a local environmental non-profit organisation to improve conservation through use of novel technology in Seychelles. The NGO, Nature Seychelles, has received a grant of $200,000 from the tech giant that will go toward a new project that has been
Read More
Jared Leto and Anne Hathaway tell the story of WeWork's descent thumbnail

Jared Leto and Anne Hathaway tell the story of WeWork’s descent

Anne Hathaway poses as she is honored with a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame in Los Angeles, California, U.S., May 9, 2019. REUTERS/Mario Anzuoni/File PhotoRegister now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.comNEW YORK, March 16 (Reuters) - The rise and fall of office-sharing company WeWork has been turned into a television series with…
Read More
Index Of News