Samsung Exynos 2200 with Xclipse 920 graphics chip has been tested in OpenCL and Vulkan and offers high performance

Samsung Exynos 2200 z układem graficznym Xclipse 920 został przetestowany w OpenCL oraz Vulkan i oferuje wysoką wydajność Samsung Exynos 2200 is the upcoming flagship processor from the Korean company and prepared with, among others, in mind about top smartphones. In recent days, the SoC system has become loud, mainly due to the official announcement from Samsung. We can count that the Exynos 2200 will go to some smartphones from the Galaxy S22 series. Its strongest advantage is to be a completely new graphics system – Xclipse 920 – prepared in cooperation with AMD. The Xclipse 920 uses the RDNA 2 architecture that has already shown – that it scales very well for a variety of solutions (desktops, laptops, consoles, custom APUs in portable consoles). The first tests of the Xclipse 920 system, which were made in the OpenCL and Vulkan environments, appeared in the GeekBench database. How does the new GPU perform compared to the competing Adreno 730 chip, which is part of the SoC Snapdragon 8 Gen.1? The results are definitely promising.

The Samsung Exynos 2200 processor with the Xclipse 920 graphics chip (AMD RDNA 2) has been tested on GeekBench for GPU performance in OpenCL and Vulkan environments. The results are very optimistic.

“src=” https://indexofnews.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/01/newsomatic/23_samsung_exynos_2200_z_ukladem_graficzny_xclipse_920_zostal_przetestowany_w_opencl_oraz_vulkan_i_offeruje_wysoka_wydajosc_0.jpg “> _0.jpg”>

Samsung Exynos 2200 with Xclipse GPU on AMD RDNA 2 with ray tracing support officially presented

In the GeekBench database there are entries about the layout Samsung Xclipse 920 with the code name GFX1040, which is assigned to the RDNA 2 architecture. The program reveals that the GPU worked at 555 MHz and had 4 GB of memory (most likely, however, the phone’s RAM memory, which is shared). The benchmark also reveals that the system Xclipse 920 graphic has 3 Compute Units, which means it also has 192 stream processors. On the one hand it is therefore a poor version of the RDNA 2 architecture, but due to its lowanie, in smartphones should show above-average performance. But how does the new Xclipse 920 chip play against the Adreno 730?

Samsung Exynos 2200 with the Xclipse 920 graphics chip has been tested in OpenCL and Vulkan and offers high performance [2]

Samsung Exynos 2200 with AMD GPU tested. Could Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 feel at risk?

In the OpenCL test, the system prepared jointly by AMD and Samsung obtained a score of 9143 points. The OnePlus 10 Pro smartphone was selected for comparison, which is one of the first models equipped with the SoC Snapdragon 8 Gen.1 with Adreno 730. In this case, the result is around 6050 points, so nearly 50% worse compared to the Xclipse 920. There were slightly smaller differences in the case of the test, which was based on the Vulkan environment. In this case, the GPU in Exynos 2200 set the result of 9029 points (the highest), while the Adreno 730 obtained the best result at the level of 7502 points. We are talking about a difference of 20% in favor of Samsung’s solution. Smartphones from the Galaxy S22 line will debut soon, which will certainly give us a broader view of the possibilities of the RDNA 2 architecture in the form of Xclipse 920.

Samsung Exynos 2200 with the Xclipse 920 graphics chip has been tested in OpenCL and Vulkan and offers high performance [3]

Samsung Exynos 2200 with the Xclipse 920 graphics chip has been tested in OpenCL and Vulkan and offers high performance [4]

Samsung Exynos 2200 with the Xclipse 920 graphics chip has been tested in OpenCL and Vulkan and offers high performance [5]

Source : VideoCardz, GeekBench

Note: This article have been indexed to our site. We do not claim legitimacy, ownership or copyright of any of the content above. To see the article at original source Click Here

Related Posts
Google could be held responsible for search results thumbnail

Google could be held responsible for search results

O Google está numa situação difícil. Um tribunal recusou-se recentemente a revogar uma decisão que exige que o Google “censure” a Internet. Isto significa que o Google pode ser forçado a retirar certos websites dos seus resultados de pesquisa. O Google está numa situação difícil. Um tribunal recusou-se recentemente a revogar uma decisão que exige…
Read More
3 nitpicky complaints about Apple's Peek Performance event thumbnail

3 nitpicky complaints about Apple’s Peek Performance event

Reviews, News, CPU, GPU, Articles, Columns, Other "or" search relation.3D Printing, 5G, Accessory, AI, Alder Lake, AMD, Android, Apple, ARM, Audio, Biotech, Business, Camera, Cannon Lake, Cezanne (Zen 3), Charts, Chinese Tech, Chromebook, Coffee Lake, Comet Lake, Console, Convertible / 2-in-1, Cryptocurrency, Cyberlaw, Deal, Desktop, E-Mobility, Education, Exclusive, Fail, Foldable, Gadget, Galaxy Note, Galaxy S,…
Read More
The Great Red Spot of Jupiter is not only shrinking, but the wind speed continues to increase thumbnail

The Great Red Spot of Jupiter is not only shrinking, but the wind speed continues to increase

北京时间9月30日消息,据国外媒体报道,近年来,哈勃太空望远镜一直在研究木星大红斑,最新研究结果显示,大红斑由于某些神秘原因正在缩小,与此同时大红斑风力发生变化,风速逐渐变快。 这是一幅持续23秒木星大红斑循环视频,是由哈勃太空望远镜观测数据制作的,代表了大约10个地球小时(或者一个木星日)的活动。木星环绕太阳公转一周需要12个地球年,在2009-2020年的木星绕日运行周期中,木星大红斑外环风速增加了8%,虽然风速变化取决于哈勃太空望远镜观测风暴的时间,但依据长期观测数据,哈勃太空望远镜确实跟踪了外环风力速度的持续变快。现今大红斑外环风速经常超过每秒100米(相当于时速360公里),而在10年前,该区域经常达到每秒90米(相当于时速324公里)。事实上,大红斑直径甚至大于地球直径,天文学家们已经对大红斑进行长达150多年的定期观测,最早的观测记录可追溯至17世纪,因此我们掌握着相对较长时间内大红斑发生变化的证据。研究人员称,与我们在地球上看到的风暴速度相比,这是难以置信的,但在木星表面,风暴速度的典型增长速度低于2.6公里/小时。哈勃太空望远镜的精度和长期观测记录提供了充足证据,相关软件数据分析跟踪了木星观测期间数万至数十万风向量(风力方向和速度)。由于哈勃太空望远镜无法观测到大红斑风暴深处,目前研究人员正在努力分析为什么会出现风速增加,风暴云顶部之下的任何事情在数据中都是无法体现的,但这是一项非常有趣的数据,可以帮助我们了解什么因素促进了大红斑风力加速,以及它是如何维持能量的。目前,美国宇航局“朱诺号”探测器正在木星轨道执行勘测任务,偶尔会观测到大红斑,但相关报告并未说明朱诺号观测数据有助于解开这个风暴谜团。朱诺号探测器任务小组已与哈勃太空望远镜和夏威夷双子座天文台研究小组建立合作,绘制木星的大气和风暴状况,未来朱诺号探测器还将深入观察大红斑,绘制该风暴的深度图像。
Read More
Index Of News
Total
0
Share