Answers to question
WiQiX | |
If you want to compare cameras, compare photos, not the number of MPx. This has nothing to do with the quality of the photos (unless it had only 0.5 MPx, it would affect the quality).
lubokubo76 |
In the photo no. is ideal. There is also a small difference in the rose on the window (No. 5 vs 35).
108 MPx will be barely the native resolution of the mobile phone – it will be interpolation=additional, artificial increase in the number of pixels.
Turing’s test really isn’t one of my favorite discussion topics
Bzuci. | |
Put in google “108 mpx” and see for yourself.
well, so allegedly yes, no: https: //www.gsmarena. com / xiaomi_redmi_note_10_pro -… but I know from experience that higher resolution is not always better and I even know a case where Nikon returned to 12 Mpix for its higher range of compacts, because the chip with higher resolution was worse as a result .. .
The Turing test really isn’t one of my favorite topics of discussion
passers-by | |
Agree, in general, a higher resolution on the same chip area means a higher digital sum
Roman | |
Maybe within one technology, with the same generation and with the same manufacturer. If your statement were true in general, my current dslr with 24 Mpx could not be better than the previous one with 12 Mpx
it will not be a coincidence that even the top full-frame SLRs from Sony do not have more than 60 Mpix. And, as far as I know, Sony is one of the leaders in the production of sensor chips. But clearly, mobile marketing does a lot and 100 Mpix is really crappy …
The Turing test really is not one of my favorite topics of discussion
Mr. Kája | |
This sounds incredibly absurd. That’s why fullframe SLRs don’t have more than 60mpix? If you had said that a few years ago, it would have been a fool for him to even think about a crazy 60mpx for a fullframe, where 20mpx is already meaningless. And helemese, how everything has shifted.) And I suppose it doesn’t end there. Personally, I feel that the lower number of mpx on the top models is more about the scanning speed than the quality.
Gerg | |
Vis, what does full frame mean?
Mr. Kája | |
Yes, any more questions? .)
Gerg | |
I read “a little” stupidly and I interpreted it so that you consider 60 and even 20 MPx for a fullframe sensor to be an absurd power.
Bzuci | |
It’s all nice, but the native 108Mpx just is on the market. And just for those who want the highest number.
Roman | |
Try to study something about photo chips first, especially what “pixel binning” is, before you start to theorize about interpolation
tto54 | |
on the contrary, the mobile has divided the 108MPx into four, it will use four pixels for better sensitivity, so in the end it only has 28mpix. Of course you can turn on the 108MPx mode, but the 28mpix looks better, due to better sensitivity
|
108px typically combines 9 pixels, 4 pixels typically merge 48 and 64MPx sensors
loren | |
You can’t compare that. The photomodule is one thing, then it also depends a lot on what the SoC can do and how the manufacturer will play with the processing in the photo application. Otherwise, I would guess that a mobile phone with 108Mpix captures more details than the one with 12Mpix, such was my experience in the transition from Lumia 1020 (42MP) to S9 (12MP).
More details possible, but also significantly more noise. 12MPix is up to most activities. Or I don’t know anyone who would take pictures of billboards with their mobile phones. At best, it looks at a 4K monitor and 12MPix is still enough
Apple iPhone 11 Pro 64GB Midnight Green (Vodafone) | Apple iPod Shuffle 3rd gen 2GB Pink | Apple MacBook Pro 13 “(Mid 2012, i5, 8GB RAM, 240GB SSD) |
Mr. Kája | |
So we learned that DJ Kuře did not own the lumina 1020.) Honestly, if similar lessons were universally applicable, how could the best photo car be in its time? in the dark Huawei with more than 40mpx and not some 12mpx phone? 108mpx cameras in phones have a relatively solid possibility of digital zoom / crop even after taking a picture. Even 27mpx images from mi10pro were quite solid and 1: 1. Samsung managed to take extra sharp 12mpx images during the day with the same camera (aggressive processing). It just depends on how the camera / mobil takes pictures and I wouldn’t follow some universal rules. After all, my SLR has the same size sensor as its predecessor, almost 2x higher resolution, higher dynamic range and images have less noise (mainly it’s good not to compare all images 1: 1, but at the appropriate magnification).
ms | |
Again, I don’t understand your trolling.
albi | |
If you don’t understand, don’t solve it and buy Appl.
MiK |
With regard to the quality of the lens (or the whole optics), I would not solve it at all.
bugsy | |
I recently sold a used mobile phone to a woman and she asks how many mpx it has. I say it doesn’t matter at all.
Time | |
On 4K TV you need about 9.5 MPix (bmp or RAW, jpg shows compression) Therefore 12 MPix is enough. Quality depends on the size of the sensor and the aperture of the lens.
redmond | |
The lens has no Mpx, but it doesn’t matter because you’re a troll.
Positron |
Although the lens has no Mpx, physics is applied here as well. Also, a certain amount of light must pass through it, there is definitely a difference when they have to “pass through the details” with a lens diameter of eg 3mm and 30mm.
|
Yes iPhones have 12MPx sensors and in most cases they will overcome any cheap china and only equal / surpass a few phones. It should be noted that, for example, a 48MPx sensor normally combines 4 pixels into one, thus normally produces 12MPx photos, 64MPx sensors usually take 16MPx photos and again combine 4 pixels into one. 108MPx sensor shoots 12MPx and combines 9 pixels into one However, the optics and pixel size of the sensor are important and it will be reflected mainly in the worse lighting conditions. Anyway, mobile photography is a purely computational photo, and dozens of different processes that embellish the photo in different ways run smoothly, edit etc. So more than about the lens, it’s about what kind of person image processing works, whether the result of the iPhone suits him more, Samsung or other … The advantage of the iPhone is that in addition to the calculated photo, it can take photos in RAW (iPhone 12 Pro / Pro Max , 13 Pro / Pro Max) with iPhone 13 will then come various photo profiles, where one will be able to create a profile in which the user will edit AI photos by default with that it can detect up to 4 people in the image and adjusting the color of the photo will not affect the skin tone of those people Long story short. The pixel size on the sensor, the quality of the optics / lens aperture / stabilization and image processing determine the final quality of the photo in the mobile phone.
CosiOdvedle | |
All consent except for the unnecessary pulling out of the iPhone and its benefits of the art of storing in RAW, as if other mobile phones could not. I basically take photos in RAW with my old Galaxy S8, which can also do it by default (in PRO mode, if anyone is surprised that the Samsung Galaxy S can’t do it).
|
Thanks for adding knowledge, he samsung lecos too russian, he needs what now apple is introducing as cinematic video samsung mel and quietly downloaded support
Bzuci. | |
My Huawei can also take pictures in RAW, somehow it didn’t seem like a rare feature to me. Photos from RAW have the advantage that they are not conceited things – I have a photo of myself in a khaki shirt with khaki buttons in bad light, where AI in J The PEG preview just took the buttons as a mistake and completely erased them, they just aren’t there, and it looks completely clean. There are buttons in RAW … in general, but photos from RAW are not so fancy, today phones make up a lot of photos to be nicer. This is especially evident in bad light, where Huawei can literally work miracles.
Juken | |
Huawei RAW never took photos, only added Alpha mode.
Lynx12 | 02. 10. 2021 17:50 |
To není pravda, minimálně u P30 Pro …
Note: This article have been indexed to our site. We do not claim legitimacy, ownership or copyright of any of the content above. To see the article at original source Click Here