Catarina Martins proposes for the Budget “facilitated access to retirement for those who have 40 years of discounts” and an immediate moratorium to prevent dismissals. In the resolution approved this Saturday, with 56 votes in favor, four against and 13 abstentions, the BE says that the OE “made possible by PCP and PAN brought a setback or stagnation”. For 2022, includes a program to reinstate “non-covid care”. It assumes the “negative result” in the local authorities, with “sharp loss of terms among executives, from 12 to five”.
During the press conference held within the scope of the National Bureau meeting, Catarina Martins pointed out four priority intervention areas: health, work, social security and the energy crisis. And it outlined a new goal in terms of State Budget (OE) negotiations for 2022, in terms of long contributory careers.
From the beginning, it consists of “proposing easier access to retirement for those who have 40 years of discounts: recalculation of pensions awarded, who, given the current law, would not be subject to the sustainability factor” and, thus, correcting the pension value for those who retired before the entry into force of the law, without retroactive effect.
“A moratorium is immediately needed to prevent redundancies in companies with profits. In addition, the Bloc assumes as A priority, within the framework of the negotiation of the next OE, is the change of labor laws. There will be no recovery of the country without a response to the injustice caused by the intermediation of work (temporary work companies, outsourcings), the expiry of collective contracting or the maintenance of cuts in the retirement pensions of those who have 40 or more years of contributory career”, exp reads the BE. And “workers who have had long contributory careers (over 40 years old), shift workers or workers with disabilities should have their pension cuts reversed”.
In labor matters, he also refers that “the maintenance of the troika’s laws in the Labor Code – from the reduction of overtime pay to the cheaper dismissals – puts pressure on lower wages”. And “none of the 64 proposals presented by the Government in social consultation is effective in the face of precariousness, labor deregulation or wage stagnation.” On the other hand, “the blackmail and muzzle rules of workers are maintained and are a fundamental instrument of the employers’ strategy for the post-pandemic crisis: the replacement of workers with rights by precarious workers”.
In the National Bureau’s political resolution, approved with 56 votes in favour, 13 abstentions and four votes against, the BE says that “it does not give up on a State Budget that responds to the country “.
“In the debate on the State Budget for 2022, the Block assumes four priority intervention areas: health, work, social security and the energy crisis. In one of these areas, the Bloc is committed to negotiating measures that respond to structural problems that, existing in many cases before the pandemic, were aggravated by it. The next Budget will have to guarantee progress where the previous one, presented by the PS government and made possible by PCP and PAN, only brought them setback or stagnation”, the document reads.
Reform social benefits and do more on the SNS
The Block promises then to “fight itself for a reform of the social benefits that determine that no member of the household can fall below the poverty line and that considers the children in full”. Today, he recalls, when accessing poverty-fighting benefits, the calculation of the household’s resource condition counts each child as 0.5 and food allowances are counted as income for the whole family, “artificially inflating available and decreasing the value of support”.
The blockers later refer that “the extraordinary success of the vaccination campaign, which protects the country and for which the NHS is the first responsible, does not hide how much was left to be done in the SNS”. And he says that, over the last year, before and after the approval of the last OE, professionals and users have repeatedly warned of the impossibility of halting the pandemic and simultaneously guaranteeing non-covid care with existing resources. This alert, to which the Bloc gave political expression, was ignored by the Government”.
The “program for the restoration of non-covid care” must start “with care primary health care and the establishment of professionals in the NHS, through the combination of measures that have been postponed for a long time – valuing careers and exclusive dedication; plan to internalize in the NHS the complementary means of diagnosis and therapeutics under convention; autonomy of institutions so that hiring and investments are not always dependent on the Ministry of Finance”, highlights the political resolution in the area of health. The Bloc also defends the “generalization of family health units; increase in the number of training places for general and family medicine in the Lisbon and Vale do Tejo region; and hiring psychologists for all groups of health centers”.
“Inflationary pressure ” and energy crisis
In the fourth point of the resolution, there is talk of “cuts of gas supplies from Russia, blackouts in Pakistan, shutdowns of electricity-intensive British or Chinese industries – steel, fertilizers – with greater agricultural and industrial risks, inflationary pressure and increasing poverty.” the energy crisis is plaguing the world, demonstrating the need to accelerate the transition to renewable sources and to impose public control of strategic energy resources”.
“The high The price of gas is the result of greater industrial demand after the pandemic, as well as greater consumption at a time of extreme weather phenomena and even imperial disputes.” And, in Europe, “the privatization of the energy sector and the existing electricity market model put the knife and the cheese in the hands of the oligopoly”.
In the Portuguese case, “the Government does not even admit corrective measures of the type taken by the Spanish Socialist Government. Instead of reducing the extraordinary gains provided to the electricity companies under this With these measures, it tries to contain the damage without touching those interests, choosing to divert tens of millions of euros from the Environmental Fund which, instead of being directed towards measures to promote the energy transition, are dedicated to allowing the electric power jackpot to be maintained. , relieves the citizen-consumer but burdens him as a taxpayer”, criticize the blockers, who will take “initiatives at the political, social and legislative level with a view to confronting the Government with its pressing responsibilities in this field”.
Note: This article has been indexed to our site. We do not claim ownership or copyright of any of the content above. To see the article at the original source Click Here