Denver’s Derivative — How To Gauge The Price Of A Bitcoin ASIC

This article is to serve as nothing more than a contribution to the bitcoin mining community.

I’m not a mathematician.

I’m not a statistician nor a certified economist.

I’m just a bitcoin miner, a builder, and a freethinker that loves spreadsheets and algebra and, for the last four years, I’ve been trying to figure out a way to properly value bitcoin ASICs at any given time while taking into consideration overall market conditions.

The following is the evolved calculation I have used to determine whether or not I should pull the trigger and purchase an ASIC — or rather this is a calculation that helps me from becoming overzealous and overpaying for hardware. I’ve been inspired to share this by the phenomenal folks in DBF.

It has kept me from making mistakes, hopefully you find it to be useful.

Denver’s Derivative Explained

Some terms to define:

  • Watts/Th=An ASIC’s total watt consumption divided by its nominal Th/s rating.
  • $/Th=The total cost of an ASIC divided by its nominal Th/s rating.
  • WattDollar=The product of an ASIC’s watts/Th multiplied by $/Th.
  • Hash price=USD value of 1 Th/s over the course of 24 hours.
  • Elongated hash price=USD value of 1 Th/s over the course of 50,000 blocks.

Denver’s Derivative (DD)=WattDollar/Elongated hash price=

  • >50=If your power is less than ~$0.035 OR you’re going to run the ASIC for five-plus years.

Below is a screenshot of some current bitcoin ASIC models, their respective specifications and their DD rating:

Denvers Derivative

Denver’s Derivative Spreadsheet Screenshot (ASIC specifications may not be precisely accurate)

Keep in mind these calculations were based on the current hash price of $0.275 and, therefore, an elongated hash price of $95.48 at the time I wrote this article per the Slush Pool/Braiins dashboard:

slush pool brains dashboard

The Problem

The problem today is that ASICs are priced based more on bitcoin’s market price than on profitability of the ASICs.

While that might sound like the same thing and, yes, bitcoin’s price definitely plays a role as to whether or not an ASIC is profitable — but it’s not the only variable — total network competition needs to also be taken into account. This is why the hash price is important — the hash price takes into consideration the value of a single Th/s over the course of 24 hours — this accounts for total competition/difficulty on the network. Therefore, ASICs should be priced based upon hash rate, but instead they’re seemingly priced solely on bitcoin’s market price and sentiment around that market price.

A quick example of how this creates disequilibrium throughout hardware markets:

Let’s say today an Antminer S19 is priced at $10,000 even and bitcoin’s market price is at $50,000 even. In today’s market, what we see is if bitcoin’s market price moves to $55,000 (a 10% increase), we’ll often see a comparable relative increase in ASIC prices, and that $10,000 ASIC is now $11,000 delivered. But that ASIC may not be 10% more profitable denominated in USD. Here’s why: If, while the bitcoin price increased from $50,000 to $55,000, the total competition on the network could have increased from 160 Eh/s to 168 Eh/s (5% increase). So yes, the bitcoin that the same ASIC is earning is now worth 10% more, however, it is also earning 5% less bitcoin than it was before, so really that ASIC is maybe only 5% more profitable, but it’s now 10% more expensive. I wanted to quantify that alpha to try and avoid overpaying for hardware, while being able to take advantage of price dips in hardware cost relative to profitability (a rare occurrence).

This is why incorporating the elongated hash price variable was important: It allowed me to tether the price and efficiency of ASICs to the reality of how profitable bitcoin mining is “in general” (or how valuable a Th/s is, in general) at any given time.

This reality is indicative of an immature market ripe for disruption, innovation and commoditization. I hope to see maturation in the coming nine years, but in the short term, I’ll be relying upon this derivative to know whether or not my ASIC price is on par with historical prices.

Conclusion

The reason I personally find this calculation to be useful is because it takes into consideration the three most important variables when purchasing an ASIC:

  • The thermodynamic/computational efficiency of the ASIC — w/Th
  • The capital/cost efficiency of the asic — $/Th
  • The overall health of the hash power market — elongated hash price

This way I could tell if I was getting a good price across time.

This way I could help those who want to mine at home using Upstream Data’s BlackBox.

I hope you find it to be useful and I welcome any and all criticism.

May you find great success in all your hashing endeavors.

Adam Ortolf

This is a guest post by Adam Ortolf. Opinions expressed are entirely their own and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine.

Note: This article have been indexed to our site. We do not claim legitimacy, ownership or copyright of any of the content above. To see the article at original source Click Here

Related Posts

Nord Anglia’s Tech-enabled Learning And Development Programme Achieves Global Accolade For Third Year Running

Learning and Performance Institute commends Nord Anglia as an organisation that 'continually learns and improves' with a 'winning formula' to learning and development LONDON, Sept. 29, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- Nord Anglia Education today announced that it has been awarded formal accreditation for the third year running by the Learning and Performance Institute (LPI) for the…
Read More
BNB’s Meteoric Rise: Early Holder’s $54M Profit and Ongoing Journey thumbnail

BNB’s Meteoric Rise: Early Holder’s $54M Profit and Ongoing Journey

You are here: Home / News / BNB’s Meteoric Rise: Early Holder’s $54M Profit and Ongoing Journey In a remarkable turn of events, an early Binance Coin (BNB) holder recently deposited 7,005 BNB, valued at a staggering $1.48 million, into Binance once again. This move has sent shockwaves throughout the cryptocurrency community and has prompted
Read More
These strict rules apply to high school entrants this year thumbnail

These strict rules apply to high school entrants this year

Portfolio 2022. január 09. 08:01 Felidézték, hogy tavaly a szülők legfeljebb az iskola kapujáig kísérhették gyermeküket, akikre a belépést követően azonnal lázmérés és kézfertőtlenítés várt, a folyosókon pedig kötelező volt a maszkhasználat. A riportban megszólal Horváth Péter, a győri Révai Miklós Gimnázium igazgatója, a Nemzeti Pedagóguskar elnöke, aki elmondta: A szabályok ugyan azok maradtak, mint…
Read More
NHBC registrations fall 42% thumbnail

NHBC registrations fall 42%

The National House Building Council (NHBC) has a roughly 75% market share of the UK new home warranties and insurance market. Developers register with NHBC ahead of construction starting. Housing completions also fell in the second quarter but by a less dramatic 11%. A total of 38,044 new homes were registered in the months of
Read More
Rzymkowski on lower salaries of teachers: the problem is marginal and results from some kind of error thumbnail

Rzymkowski on lower salaries of teachers: the problem is marginal and results from some kind of error

Drogi Użytkowniku! W związku z odwiedzaniem naszych serwisów internetowych możemy przetwarzać Twój adres IP, pliki cookies i podobne dane nt. aktywności lub urządzeń użytkownika. Jeżeli dane te pozwalają zidentyfikować Twoją tożsamość, wówczas będą traktowane dodatkowo jako dane osobowe zgodnie z Rozporządzeniem Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady 2016/679 (RODO). Administratora tych danych, cele i podstawy przetwarzania oraz…
Read More
Index Of News
Total
0
Share