— Cefepime-enmetazobactam beat piperacillin-tazobactam in phase III study
by
Mike Bassett, Staff Writer, MedPage Today
February 23, 2024
Last Updated February 26, 2024
The FDA approved the combination of cefepime and enmetazobactam (Exblifep) for the treatment of adult patients with complicated urinary tract infections, including pyelonephritis, caused by designated susceptible microorganisms.
The agency’s decision was based on data from the phase III ALLIUM trial in which the β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination demonstrated superiority over piperacillin/tazobactam.
Clinical efficacy was shown for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and among Enterobacterales species for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, and Enterobacter cloacae complex, the FDA noted.
According to the drug’s labeling, cefepime/enmetazobactam should only be used to treat or prevent infections “proven or strongly suspected” to be caused by those bacteria in order to reduce drug resistance and maintain the combination’s effectiveness, as well as that of other drugs.
In ALLIUM, 1,041 patients with complicated urinary tract infection or acute pyelonephritis were randomized (mean age 54.7 years, 55% women) and 1,034 received at least one dose of the study drug.
The proportion of patients infected with gram-negative pathogens who achieved clinical cure and microbiological eradication at the test-of-cure visit was 79.1% in the cefepime/enmetazobactam group compared with 58.9% in the piperacillin/tazobactam group, a difference that met the trial’s prespecified criteria for non-inferiority and superiority.
In the 20.9% (142/678) of patients with an extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing baseline pathogen, 73.7% of patients in the cefepime/enmetazobactam group and 51.5% of those in the piperacillin/tazobactam group achieved the composite outcome.
“Antimicrobial resistance mediated by ESBLs is a critical clinical challenge and there is a substantial need for novel antibiotics that enable us to effectively treat resistant infections,” said Keith Kaye, MD, MPH, of Rutgers University in New Brunswick, New Jersey, and the study’s lead author, in a press release that accompanied the publication of ALLIUM’s results.
“Cefepime/enmetazobactam has shown improved efficacy compared to a standard of care treatment with a good safety profile,” he added. “It has the potential to become a replacement for piperacillin/tazobactam and an alternative to the use of carbapenems.”
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were observed in 50% of patients treated with cefepime/enmetazobactam and 44% of those treated with piperacillin/tazobactam, with most mild to moderate in severity (89.9% vs 88.6%, respectively).
Rates of drug-related TEAEs were 19.8% and 14.5%, respectively, and treatment-emergent serious adverse events were 4.3% and 3.7%.
The most common TEAEs were elevations of liver function parameters, including alanine aminotransferase (11.4% vs 11.6%), aspartate aminotransferase (9.1% vs 8.9%), and blood bilirubin (5.8% vs 3.9%). Headache and phlebitis/infusion site reactions were also common, according to the labeling.
Of those who received cefepime/enmetazobactam, 1.7% failed to complete therapy due to adverse events versus 0.8% of those who received piperacillin/tazobactam.
For patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 60-129 mL/min, the antibiotic combination should be administered intravenously for 7 to 14 days at a dose of 2.5 g (2 g cefepime; 0.5 g enmetazobactam) every 8 hours over a 2-hour infusion, according to the prescribing information. Dose adjustment is recommended for patients with renal impairment.
Hypersensitivity reactions have been reported in patients treated with the combination, while neurotoxicity has been reported during treatment with cefepime, mostly in patients with kidney impairment who did not receive the recommended cefepime dose adjustment. “Serious neurologic adverse reactions have occurred in geriatric patients with renal insufficiency given unadjusted doses of cefepime,” the drug labeling notes.
Mike Bassett is a staff writer focusing on oncology and hematology. He is based in Massachusetts.
Note: This article have been indexed to our site. We do not claim legitimacy, ownership or copyright of any of the content above. To see the article at original source Click Here