Fringe Doctors’ Groups Promote Ivermectin for COVID despite a Lack of Evidence

do not plan to get vaccinated or are unsure about the vaccine. But unlike the data supporting vaccines, Griffin says, the evidence behind that use of ivermectin is questionable and unclear. He worries not only that the hype over the antiparasitic drug may keep some people from getting vaccinated but also that sick people taking it at home might delay going to a hospital and miss the efficacy window for evidence-based COVID treatments.

Nevertheless, ivermectin prescriptions are soaring, topping 88,000 a week in the U.S. last month (compared with an average of 3,600 per week in 2019). Although the form of the drug sold in pharmacies is routinely prescribed for U.S. Food and Drug Administration–approved uses such as treating parasitic infections, the doses and schedules that the FLCCC posts on its Web site are not consistent with those typically advised for humans. Cedric Dark, an emergency physician and professor at Baylor College of Medicine, says ivermectin is usually given as a one-time dose when it is used as a parasite treatment. In contrast, the FLCCC’s prevention protocol suggests taking it “twice a week for as long as risk is elevated in your community.” But Griffin explains that “we do not have reliable safety data on the prolonged courses being recommended currently or in patients taking ivermectin while suffering from COVID-19 and all the immune and metabolic changes associated with this disease.”

Ivermectin was not the first drug the FLCCC endorsed for treating COVID. Paul Marik, a critical care physician and professor at Eastern Virginia Medical School, helped found the organization. In 2016 he had begun giving what became known as the “Marik cocktail” for treating sepsis, a life-threatening reaction to an infection that triggers inflammation throughout the body. The intravenously deliveredcocktail contains a high dose of vitamin C, the steroid hydrocortisone and vitamin B1. A randomized trial ultimately showed the cocktail was ineffective for sepsis. But when the pandemic hit, Marik began trying it on patients with COVID. In April 2020 he, Kory and a few of their colleagues formed the FLCCC to encourage the adoption of a modified cocktail that they thought could work for the disease. And in late 2020 the group added ivermectin to its protocols.

Much of the public interest in ivermectin as a treatment and prophylactic for COVID can be traced to a study led by Australian scientist Leon Caly that was in the spring of 2020. In that work, scientists added very high concentrations of the drug to cells grown in petri dishes and reported that it prevented the virus that causes COVID from making copies of itself. Similar studies in the past have indicated that ivermectin has antiviral properties when added to lab-grown cells: it blocked replication of viruses that cause dengue, Zika, West Nile, AIDS and other diseases. Prior to the pandemic, however, only one clinical trial had evaluated ivermectin specifically for a viral illness (dengue fever), and it showed no clinical benefit.

Nevertheless, clinical trials testing ivermectin for preventing or treating COVID began, “driven by a very generous motivation to try to find inexpensive cures that are going to prevent people from dying [of COVID],” says public health expert Howard Forman of Yale University. But the trials used different doses on different schedules, Dark says, “which makes it very difficult to compare one to the next.”

Furthermore, he says, many of the ivermectin studies have design flaws that preclude them from leading to changes in clinical practice. A report published in July by Cochrane, a highly regarded independent organization that reviews medical research and helps guide clinical practice, looked at dozens of studies on ivermectin, of which only 14 qualified for evaluation. The report excluded 38 investigations because of problems with their methodology: they either had no control group, an inappropriate control group or other kinds of biases. The 14 remaining studies, which included a total of 1,678 participants, did not support the use of ivermectin for preventing or treating COVID, the report concluded.

In contrast with ivermectin, the evidence of COVID vaccines’ effectiveness is “incredibly compelling,” Griffin says, and the majority of COVID deaths and hospitalizations are vaccine-preventable.

Yet the groups promoting ivermectin do not appear to strongly support the COVID vaccines. The FLCCC says little about them on social media and writes in the current version of its prevention protocol that ivermectin is a “safety net” for those who are not vaccinated (although that protocol adds, “Vaccines have shown efficacy in preventing the most severe outcomes of COVID-19”). AFLDS founder Simone Gold, a doctor who was arrested for activities related to her involvement in the January 6 insurrection at the Capitol and is connected to a conservative political group, and Tess Lawrie, director of a company called the Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy and organizer of the BIRD Group, have even shared vaccine misinformation in videos online. And AFLDS also gives advice on vaccine exemptions on its Web site.

Additionally, the AFLDS Web site suggests—without evidence—that there is some nefarious reason that vaccines are heralded while cheap drugs and dietary supplements (such as ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, zinc, vitamins and antibiotics) are not. The FLCCC, too, has alluded to a conspiracy in a tweet: “The FDA, the CDC, major media & others hope you’ll believe them when they tell you that [ivermectin] was meant only for animals, & that it’s dangerous to use for .”

Heidi Larson, director of the Vaccine Confidence Project at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, calls this approach “a classic tactic to undermine confidence in authority.” She adds that such “manipulation is really a core strategy across the groups that are trying to undermine confidence in vaccines.”

Dark points out that a cheap, widely available drug is used to treat symptoms of COVID: a steroid called dexamethasone. When a well-designed clinical trial showed that dexamethasone helped certain patients hospitalized with COVID, it was widely adopted by physicians. Griffin says the anticoagulant medication heparin is another example of a cheap drug being used in hospitals to help treat COVID patients.

Ivermectin can be a moneymaker, too. AFLDS charges $90 for telehealth visits with doctors willing to write off-label prescriptions for ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine—another highly touted drug that was found to be ineffective and sometimes harmful—for treating COVID. And AFLDS connects people with a digital pharmacy that will fill those prescriptions or send them to a local pharmacy, sometimes for exorbitant prices. Contacted for this story, the group declined to comment on these practices. The FLCCC also curates a list of pharmacies that will fill off-label ivermectin prescriptions, and it offers a list of physicians who use the group’s protocols. The organization did not respond to requests for comment, including on whether it earns money through these services.

Despite claims of a conspiracy against ivermectin, Griffin points out that researchers are continuing to study it and other repurposed drugs for COVID. There are at-home randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials underway, including the COVID-OUT trial, the ACTIV-6 study and the U.K.-based PRINCIPLE trial.

“I would love for ivermectin to work. Just prove it,” Forman says. But even if we have an effective treatment for a disease, that does not negate the need for a vaccine, Larson says. “We need all the tools in the toolbox,” she adds.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR(S)

    Christina Szalinski is a freelance science writer who covers life sciences and health. She is based near Philadelphia.

    Note: This article have been indexed to our site. We do not claim ownership or copyright of any of the content above. To see the article at original source Click Here

    Related Posts
    Peach, domestic 72-hour sale All 34 routes, to stimulate demand after declaration thumbnail

    Peach, domestic 72-hour sale All 34 routes, to stimulate demand after declaration

     ピーチ・アビエーション(APJ/MM)は9月29日午後10時から、国内線全34路線が対象の72時間セールを開催する。年末年始も対象で、片道1690円から用意する。関西と成田を発着する便では片道2000円台の価格設定が多く見られる。販売は10月2日午後9時59分まで。 国内全線を対象にしたセールを開催するピーチ=PHOTO: Tadayuki YOSHIKAWA/Aviation Wire  搭乗期間は10月1日から2022年1月5日まで。路線により異なり、一部適用除外日や対象外の便がある。最安値は冬ダイヤ初日の10月31日に増便する中部-那覇線で、1690円で販売。同日に開設する新路線の福岡-石垣線も対象で、1990円から用意する。  関空発着の場合、成田線が片道2890円から、釧路線と女満別線は2490円から。成田発着は札幌線が2990円、福岡線が3490円、石垣線が2990円から。  ピーチは冬ダイヤが始まる10月31日に、福岡-石垣線を開設。全日本空輸(ANA/NH)の運航路線を引き継ぐもので、このほかANA便が減便となった路線を中心に、ピーチの既存4路線も増便する。今回のセールにより、緊急事態宣言解除後の需要喚起を図る。 関連リンク72時間限定SALE(Peach Aviation) ・緊急事態宣言とまん防を全面解除 9月末で(21年9月28日) ・ピーチ、機長考案の紙飛行機 用紙・半完成品をセット販売(21年9月27日) ・なぜANAは737路線をピーチに移管するのか 玉突きで787運航最適化(21年8月29日) ・ピーチ、福岡-石垣10月就航 LCC初、ANAから移管(21年8月24日) ・ANA、ピーチへ国内10便移管 冬ダイヤ、ワクチン後の観光需要増見込む(21年8月24日) ・ピーチ、パルコとコラボ 第1弾は「旅くじ」カプセル自販機(21年8月17日)
    Read More
    How Our Brain Preserves Our Sense of Self thumbnail

    How Our Brain Preserves Our Sense of Self

    We are all time travelers. Each day, we experience new things as we travel forward through time. In the process, the countless connections between the nerve cells in our brain recalibrate to accommodate these experiences. It’s as if we reassemble ourselves daily, maintaining a mental construct of ourselves in physical time, and the glue that…
    Read More
    Space photo of the week: Hubble spies a dwarf galaxy thumbnail

    Space photo of the week: Hubble spies a dwarf galaxy

    UGC 8091 is a dwarf irregular galaxy about 7 million light-years away from our solar system. (Image credit: Image credit: ESA/Hubble, NASA, ESA, Yumi Choi (NSF's NOIRLab), Karoline Gilbert (STScI), Julianne Dalcanton (Center for Computational Astrophysics/Flatiron Inst., UWashington)) What it is: The irregular dwarf galaxy UGC 8091When it was unveiled: Jan. 1, 2024Where it is:
    Read More
    Average Body Temperature Takes A Dip thumbnail

    Average Body Temperature Takes A Dip

    There are a few things everyone knows, right? No two snowflakes are exactly alike, groundhogs can’t really predict the weather and normal body temperature is 98.6 degrees Fahrenheit. The first two facts are pretty sound. But the last one may no longer be true. Where did the 98.6 dogma come from in the first place?…
    Read More
    Index Of News
    Total
    0
    Share