Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs. Pixel 8 Pro

This year Google added a new model to its flagship lineup – Google Pixel 9 Pro XL, dethroning last year’s Google Pixel 8 Pro as a top-tier Pixel in the family. Despite what the name suggests, the 9 Pro XL is more of an iterative update than a revolutionary reboot.

Furthermore, the Pixel 9 Pro XL’s launch price is considerably higher than the going price for the 8 Pro. So, on paper, the 8 Pro seems like the more sensible choice. The devil is often in the details, though, so let’s see if the 9 Pro XL deserves its price premium.

Table of Contents:

For starters, you can compare the complete specs sheets or directly continue with our editor’s assessment in the text further below.

Size comparison

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL vs. Google Pixel 8 Pro

The Google Pixel 9 Pro XL and 8 Pro have near-identical dimensions, even though this year’s 9 Pro XL has a 0.1″ bigger display. Google was able to slim down the bezels and achieve more screen real estate.

The newer Pixel is slightly thinner and heavier simultaneously, but we doubt anyone would notice in real life.

Build quality and appearance are just about the same. Gorilla Glass Victus 2 is on the front and back with an aluminum frame in the middle. The Pixel 9 Pro XL has adopted a slightly different camera island design, but that doesn’t affect handling or usage.

Display comparison

The two devices have the same underlying display tech – LTPO OLED with up to 120Hz refresh rate. Adaptive refresh rate and HDR10+ support are at hand for both handsets, but the newer 9 Pro XL is the winner in this department for two simple reasons.

Firstly, the Pro XL has the brightest display we’ve seen yet, going above 2,300 nits, while the 8 Pro maxes out at 1,600 nits. That doesn’t mean the Pro XL is about 40% brighter because luminance is measured on a logarithmic scale, not linear. Still, the newer Pixel surely provides a better viewing experience outdoors.

Secondly, you get 0.1″ of extra screen diagonal with the 9 Pro XL and more screen real estate. The thinner bezels look more modern on the newer Pixel too.

Battery life

Even though the Pixel 9 Pro XL shares the same battery as its predecessor (5,060 mAh vs. 5,050 mAh), battery life has improved. It could be due to the newer Tensor G4 chip or other under-the-hood optimizations.

Either way, the new Pixel has an Active Use Score of 12:32h, better than the 11:14h Active Use Score from the 8 Pro. While call and gaming runtimes are roughly the same, the 9 Pro XL edges out its predecessor with better web browsing and video playback, and these are, arguably, the tests that matter the most.

Charging speed

Both devices use the Power Delivery 3.0 standard for wired charging, but the 9 Pro XL’s is rated at 37W, up from the 30W on the 8 Pro. And according to our tests, the gains are noticeable.

The 9 Pro XL may still not be record setter but it’s noticeably faster than the 8 Pro at the 15-minute and 30-minute marks, delivering more than 10 percentage points difference.

However, the curve flattens as the 9 Pro XL gets closer to 100%. As a result, the full charging on the newer Pixel is just 5 minutes faster.

When it comes to wireless charging, both phones cap at 23W and that’s with the optional Pixel Stand, which provides the fastest wireless charging for these phones.

Speaker test

Technically, the 9 Pro XL offers louder speakers than the 8 Pro, but in real life, the difference isn’t all that noticeable. What’s noticeable is the sound tuning.

The 8 Pro’s speakers emphasize the vocals and mids, while the XL sounds warmer, with deeper and more pronounced bass. We can’t say which one is better, as it all boils down to personal preference, but we suspect the newer Pixel will appeal to more users.

Performance

Pixel phones have never been the high-performance type and Google has always focused more on the software side of things. That’s why the Pixel 9 Pro XL’s new in-house Tensor G4 SoC isn’t much of an improvement over last year’s G3. That’s not to say the phone doesn’t run well. Quite the opposite – both devices are snappy and responsive in their day-to-day tasks.

There’s no significant change in the memory configurations either. The newer Pixel gets 16GB of RAM across all storage variants, which is a step up from last year’s 12GB configurations, but that’s hardly an improvement, which you can feel or measure. The base storage option remains merely 128GB, but can go up to 1TB. Valid for both phones.

Benchmark performance

Naturally, the newer phone is faster than the older one, but the performance gains are somewhat modest. For instance, in CPU-heavy benchmarks like Geekbench 6, the 9 Pro XL scores 8% higher than its predecessor, but in a combined scenario like AnTuTu 10, that difference is closer to 20%. Interestingly, the 3DMark Wild Life benchmark shows almost no GPU improvements, just 5% gains that can be easily attributed to statistical error in some cases.

All in all, don’t expect any meaningful performance gain if you go for the Pixel 9 Pro XL.

Camera comparison

Jumping from just Pro to Pro XL brings little to the table in terms of camera improvements as one would expect from the price hike and naming scheme. The two handsets share largely the same camera hardware.

We’ve got the 50MP f/1.7, 1/1.31″ main shooter 48MP f/2.8, 1/2.55″ 5x periscope telephoto snapper and a 48MP ultrawide camera with some changes this year. The newer ultrawide unit gets a wider aperture (f/1.7 vs. f/2.8), but the sensor size decreases from 1/2.0″ to 1/2.55″. It’s hard to tell which approach bears better results before looking at the samples.

The selfie camera gets some love this year, though. The front-facing shooter is now 42MP, up from 10.5MP and still offers autofocus and ultrawide lens.

Image quality

As previously anticipated, the camera quality remains largely unchanged. The samples we took are from different days, which makes it harder to compare, but overall quality seems near-identical. We are hard-pressed to find any significant difference in rendition, colors, etc.

Pixel 9 Pro XL: 0.6x
Pixel 9 Pro XL: 1x
Pixel 9 Pro XL: 2x
Pixel 9 Pro XL: 5x

Pixel 9 Pro XL: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 5x

Pixel 8 Pro: 0.6x
Pixel 8 Pro: 1x
Pixel 8 Pro: 2x
Pixel 8 Pro: 5x

Pixel 8 Pro: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 5x

This is valid across all cameras and in both daylight and low-light scenarios. Even though the ultrawide shooter has changed, we couldn’t find any noticeable change in image quality there either.

Pixel 9 Pro XL: 0.6x
Pixel 9 Pro XL: 1x
Pixel 9 Pro XL: 2x
Pixel 9 Pro XL: 5x

Pixel 9 Pro XL: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 5x

Pixel 8 Pro: 0.6x
Pixel 8 Pro: 1x
Pixel 8 Pro: 2x
Pixel 8 Pro: 5x

Pixel 8 Pro: 0.6x • 1x • 2x • 5x

We did notice a slight tendency for a brighter exposure, hence brighter shadows, in some low-light scenes shot on the Pixel 9 Pro XL.

Selfies are excellent on both phones, but we expected a significant improvement on the new model.

Pixel 9 Pro XL selfies
Pixel 9 Pro XL selfies

Pixel 9 Pro XL selfies

Pixel 8 Pro selfies
Pixel 8 Pro selfies

Pixel 8 Pro selfies

Video quality

For some reason, the Pixel 9 Pro XL’s videos are considerably worse than on the 8 Pro. They are soft and lack fine detail, which is true for all three cameras on the back. We suspect this is a software issue, which Google will address with a future update, but for now, the Pixel 8 Pro is the clear winner in this segment.

In all fairness, the low-light video by the Pixel 9 Pro XL’s main camera appears to have slightly better definition due to less agressive noise reduction.

Pixel 9 Pro XL: 0.6x
Pixel 9 Pro XL: 1x
Pixel 9 Pro XL: 5x
Pixel 9 Pro XL: 1x low-light

Pixel 9 Pro XL: 0.6x • 1x • 5x • 1x low-light

Pixel 8 Pro: 0.6x
Pixel 8 Pro: 1x
Pixel 8 Pro: 5x • 1x low-light
Pixel 8 Pro: 5x • 1x low-light

Pixel 8 Pro: 0.6x • 1x • 5x • 1x low-light

Verdict

The 9 Pro XL offers upgrades that are too modest to justify the price difference of around €500/$500 at the time of writing.

Sure, the 9 Pro XL has a brighter and a tad larger screen with thinner bezels; it offers a modest improvement in charging, battery life and speaker loudness, but that’s not nearly enough to persuade a potential buyer to shed a few extra hundred bucks. Especially when you consider the long software support both devices are entitled to and the near-identical camera performance. In fact, the 8 Pro edges out its successor in this regard with better-looking video quality.

    Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

    Get the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL for:

  • The brighter and 0.1″ bigger display.
  • The slightly improved battery life.
  • The slightly faster charging.
  • The differently tuned speakers.
  • The extra year of software support.

These are the best offers from our affiliate partners. We may get a commission from qualifying sales.

128GB 16GB RAM€ 1,135.99Deal£ 1,099.00Deal
256GB 16GB RAM€ 983.18Deal£ 1,060.71Deal
Show all prices
    Google Pixel 8 Pro

    Get the Google Pixel 8 Pro for:

  • The considerably lower price tag.
  • The better video recording.
  • The largely identical user experience.

These are the best offers from our affiliate partners. We may get a commission from qualifying sales.

128GB 12GB RAM€ 671.04Deal£ 441.45Deal
256GB 12GB RAM€ 785.99Deal£ 709.00Deal
Show all prices

Note: This article have been indexed to our site. We do not claim legitimacy, ownership or copyright of any of the content above. To see the article at original source Click Here

Related Posts
PayPay Store Fees Will Not Cause “Merchant Withdrawal” Reasons Mobile Payment Journalists Expect thumbnail

PayPay Store Fees Will Not Cause “Merchant Withdrawal” Reasons Mobile Payment Journalists Expect

 PayPayがいよいよ、10月1日に加盟店のシステム利用手数料を有料化する。同社は2018年10月5日のサービス開始以来、店舗が掲示するQRコードをユーザーが自身のスマートフォンで読み込む「MPM方式」を利用する店舗に対して、決済手数料無料の施策を続けてきた。 加盟店のシステム利用手数料有料化に伴い、キャンペーンを実施  「契約時に追加で発生するコストはなく、いつでも止められる」ということで、主に中小規模の店舗を中心に多くの加盟店を獲得してきたPayPayは、21年8月時点で340万カ所での利用が可能になった。だが10月1日以降はこの手数料が1.98%になる。  これを受けてPayPay利用を取り下げる加盟店もあると思うが、結論から言うと、実はPayPay有料化では「加盟店の離脱」という現象は実はそれほど起きないのではないのかというのが筆者の予想だ。大多数は「そのまま継続」というパターンになると思われる。加えて、業界全体からすると、PayPayが手数料を2%弱に設定したことで、競合他社は決済手数料でもうける戦略をとりにくくなるだろう。 手数料有料化でコード決済の分野に起こること  モバイル決済業界に新規参入が相次いだ18年から19年にかけ、PayPay対抗の意図もあり、各社はMPM方式の加盟店について原則として決済手数料無料のキャンペーンを実施していた。これら施策はPayPayの無料期間が終了する前に段階的に有料プランへと移行していった。  NTTドコモでウォレットビジネス推進室長を務める田原務氏によれば、d払いでは一部の店舗を対象に手数料の有料化を進めているが、加盟店の目立った離脱は見られなかったという。有料化が即、加盟店離れにつながるわけではないようだ。  しかし、PayPayが21年8月に入って具体的な手数料を発表すると、楽天ペイやau PAYといったライバルらは次々と加盟店手数料の無料期間を1年延長すると発表。ライバル各社の手数料無料キャンペーン延長は既存加盟店をつなぎ止めるというよりも、新規開拓でPayPayをリードする意図が強い。  大手チェーンなどに加え、特に中小店舗での加盟店開拓を熱心に進めていたことで知られるPayPayは、これまでキャッシュレス決済を導入してこなかったような個人店であっても現金ではない決済手段を使えるようにした功績がある。これは同社が営業リソースを大量導入してローラー作戦を全国展開してきたことに由来するもので、その点で他社は出遅れていた。 和歌山県の紀伊田辺駅周辺では多数のPayPay加盟店がある  田原氏によれば、ここ最近の傾向としてd払いの伸びを支えているのは大手チェーンよりもむしろこうした中小加盟店であり、手数料無料キャンペーンの延長はそうした新規加盟店を獲得するうえで大きな意味を持つと述べている。PayPayが有料化した隙を縫った話題作りというより、むしろ「事業の伸びを絶やさない」という意図があるようだ。 PayPay副社長COOの馬場一氏  他方で、このように拡大した加盟店網の収益化という面で、今後ライバル各社は大きな困難に直面するとも予想される。PayPayでは決済手数料で稼ごうとは考えておらず、PayPay副社長COOの馬場一氏によれば「決済手数料ではトントン程度でいい。そのプラットフォーム上で展開される付加サービスや金融事業によるローンなどで利益を上げていければいい」という。  実際、各社の意見によると2%前後という手数料水準は、ビジネス的にはほぼギリギリと聞く。コード決済の場合、残高チャージのルートは銀行口座経由の入金、キャリア決済、クレジットカードなど複数用意されていることが多い。クレジットカードからチャージする場合は決済事業者に別途数%の手数料を抜かれるため、1.98%という手数料では本来赤字となってしまう。  それでも1.98%という水準を設定可能なのは、他のファンディングソースである口座入金やキャリア決済のルートがあるためで、有料化とはいってもPayPayが丸もうけというわけではなく、赤字にならないための最低限の水準がそこにあるというわけだ。  たとえ離脱する店舗があったとしても、スーパーなどのチェーン店を除けば、それら中小加盟店の多くは「そもそもPayPay利用がそこまでなかった」とみられ、PayPayの経営的なインパクトはごく小さい水準にとどまると考えられる。PayPay利用が多かった店舗で取り扱いを止めれば、逆に顧客離れを起こす可能性もあるわけで、店舗側は両者を吟味して判断を迫られることになる。  業界的なインパクトとしては、PayPayが手数料を発表したことで、決済手数料を当てにした金融ビジネスを展開しにくくなったといえる。前述のように各社は微妙なバランスでビジネスを構築している。クレジットカードに比べて専用機器やネットワークを必要としないコード決済はコスト面で有利とされるが、それでも手数料3%前後の水準ですでに損益分岐点にあり、これをさらに1段階下げる2%前後という水準は企業の業績を圧迫する。  これはMPM方式に比べてもシステム利用コストが高い店舗読み取り型の「CPM方式」の加盟店との手数料交渉にも波及するとみられ、マネタイズをより困難にする。PayPayが業界にもたらしたインパクトは「決済ビジネスはもうからない」という事実を確定させた点だ。今後は周辺ビジネスとのシナジーをともなわないコード決済事業者は早晩行き詰まる可能性が高いだろう。 Copyright © ITmedia, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Read More
iOS 15.0.1 and iPadOS 15.0.1: bug fixes welcome thumbnail

iOS 15.0.1 and iPadOS 15.0.1: bug fixes welcome

Les iPhone et iPad peuvent être mis à jour vers iOS 15.0.1 et iPadOS 15.0.1, des versions qui apportent des correctifs attendus. Craig Federighi présentant iOS 15 à la WWDC 2021 // Source : Apple – Capture Frandroid Une dizaine de jours après le lancement d’iOS 15 dans sa version finale, Apple déploie d’ores et déjà un premier correctif…
Read More
Why Enterprises are Training AI for Local Markets thumbnail

Why Enterprises are Training AI for Local Markets

Enterprise customers of companies like Microsoft and Google have come to expect their office productivity suites -- Office 365 and Google Docs -- to incorporate localization for the various markets where employees work and where they do business with customers. For instance, that means that Office 365 could be customized in preferences to use certain…
Read More
Index Of News
Total
0
Share