Judiciary Committee details attempt to overturn election…

Washington (CNN)The Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday released a sweeping report about how former President Donald Trump and a top lawyer in the Justice Department attempted to overturn the 2020 presidential election.

Trump directly asked the Justice Department nine times to undermine the election result, and his chief of staff Mark Meadows broke administration policy by pressuring a Justice Department lawyer to investigate claims of election fraud, according to the report, which is based on witness interviews of top former Justice Department officials.

The Democratic-led committee also revealed that White House counsel Pat Cipollone threatened to quit in early January as Trump considered replacing then-acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen with Jeffrey Clark, a DOJ lawyer who supported election fraud conspiracies.

    After the eight-month investigation, the findings highlight the relentlessness of Trump and some of his top advisers as they fixated on using the Justice Department to prop up false conspiracies of election fraud. The committee report, the most comprehensive account so far of Trump’s efforts to overturn the election, described his conduct as an abuse of presidential power.

      Soon after the release of the report Thursday morning, Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley’s office issued a GOP version, which pushes back on the Democrats’ findings and defends Trump, saying he “listened to his senior advisors and followed their advice and recommendations.”

      Appearing on CNN’s “New Day” Thursday morning, Senate Judiciary Chairman Dick Durbin, an Illinois Democrat, said the US was a “half a step away from a constitutional crisis, a full-blown constitutional crisis” and explained the events unfolded in three phases.

      “First phase, Trump goes to court. Loses every lawsuit, which claims there was voter fraud in the election. Next, he decides he has to take over the Department of Justice and the attorney general, and have the attorney general push this narrative on to the states to tell them to stop from sending in their Electoral College vote totals. When that failed — and our report goes into graphic detail of the efforts that were made — the third step was to turn the mob loose on the Capitol the day we were counting the ballots,” Durbin said, referring to the January 6 riot.

      DOJ lawyer was crucial player, Democrats say

      READ: Senate Judiciary Committee report on Trump's attempt to overturn 2020 election

      The 400-page report by Senate Democrats, entitled “Subverting Justice,” slams the actions of Clark, who they say became a crucial player in Trump’s attempt to use the Justice Department for his political gain.

      The Senate Judiciary Committee announced on Thursday they were referring him to the DC Bar for a review of his professional conduct, citing rules that bar attorneys from assisting in fraud and interfering with the administration of justice.

      The committee said it has not yet made findings of possible criminality, since their investigation is not complete. Clark has not been charged with any crime, and an attorney for Clark didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

      Clark was not interviewed by the committee. Instead, top Justice Department officials described in interviews his and Trump’s plans to overturn the election.

      Clark had pushed Rosen and Richard Donoghue, then the second-in-command at the Justice Department, to use the Justice Department to announce election fraud investigations and ask state leaders in Georgia to appoint electors, potentially disregarding the certified popular vote. Clark began making the pitch in late December after speaking with Trump directly, the committee found.

      The Senate committee wrote he may have had assistance from “lower-level allies” within the Justice Department and even attempted to bargain with Rosen on his plan, saying he would turn down a chance at taking Rosen’s place if Rosen would agree to support his Georgia elector initiative.

      “Clark’s proposal to wield DOJ’s power to override the already-certified popular vote reflected a stunning distortion of DOJ’s authority: DOJ protects ballot access and ballot integrity, but has no role in determining which candidate won a particular election,” the committee wrote.

      Donoghue and Rosen both testified to the committee.

      ‘Leave the rest to me’

      Trump allies did little to investigate election fraud claims, court documents show

      The series of interactions between the President and Rosen and Donoghue began in mid-December with an Oval Office meeting, included several phone calls and continued through January 3.

      In multiple calls, Trump claimed there was election fraud in Pennsylvania and Arizona — both states he lost — telling Rosen “people are saying” and asking the Justice Department to look into the rumors, according to the committee.

      Trump also told the DOJ leadership, “You guys aren’t following the internet the way I do,” according to both Donoghue and Rosen.

      Rosen told the President the department “can’t and won’t just flip a switch and change the election.” That prompted Trump to simply ask for an official Justice announcement that the election was corrupt and then “leave the rest to me and the Congressmen,” the committee report noted.

      The department hadn’t found any widespread fraud in the election, and simultaneously Trump’s campaign was filing lawsuits to throw out millions of votes in the swing states.

      Trump had Rosen and Clark vie for the attorney general’s job during the nearly three-hour meeting on January 3 before deciding not to replace Rosen with Clark, the report found. It also details how discussions about Clark’s plan in Georgia became inextricably linked to talks about him replacing Rosen.

      “According to Rosen, Trump opened the meeting by saying, ‘One thing we know is you, Rosen, aren’t going to do anything to overturn the election,'” the report says.

      “Over the course of the next three hours, the group had what Donoghue called ‘a wide-ranging conversation’ focused on whether Trump should replace DOJ’s leadership, install Clark in Rosen’s place, and send Clark’s proposed letter—and whether Clark was even qualified to assume the Acting Attorney General position. Rosen and Donoghue told us that by this point, Clark’s proposed letter and his potential role as Acting Attorney General were intertwined,” it adds.

      Threat of mass resignations at Justice Department

      Trump's appeasers only make his assault on democracy worse

      The report goes on to note that at some point during the meeting, Donoghue and Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel Steve Engel made clear that there would be mass resignations at DOJ if Trump moved forward with replacing Rosen with Clark — something he told the committee was “important context” for the then-president as he weighed his decision.

      Donoghue and Rosen also recalled White House lawyers Cipollone and Patrick Philbin pushing back on the plan to replace Rosen with Clark, with Cipollone calling Clark’s letter a “murder-suicide pact” and the two White House lawyers indicating that they would also resign, according to the report.

      Despite the threat of mass resignations, Trump “continued for some time to entertain the idea of installing Clark in Rosen’s place,” the report notes. It also says that Donoghue told the panel that Trump did not reject Clark’s course of action until “‘very deep into the conversation,’ within the final 15 minutes of the two- to three-hour meeting.”

        CNN previously reported that Rosen, during his closed-door interview with the committee, spoke of numerous interactions with Clark, but much of the focus of his testimony was on five episodes where Clark went out of the chain of command to push the fraud claims — including the January 3 White House meeting.

        This story has been updated with additional findings from the report and reaction.

        CNN’s Chandelis Duster contributed to this report.

        Note: This article have been indexed to our site. We do not claim legitimacy, ownership or copyright of any of the content above. To see the article at original source Click Here

        Related Posts
        Knicks’ Kemba Walker may not play back-to-backs when he returns thumbnail

        Knicks’ Kemba Walker may not play back-to-backs when he returns

        Kemba Walker still hasn’t played in 2022. Despite coach Tom Thibodeau talking for days about how close he is, Walker missed his seventh straight game Wednesday. Walker was shut down on New Year’s Eve after a back-to-back set in Minnesota and Detroit. Thibodeau didn’t rule out the possibility that even upon the Bronx native’s return,…
        Read More
        The vice president of the Episcopal Conference also tested positive for Covid-19 thumbnail

        The vice president of the Episcopal Conference also tested positive for Covid-19

        Se trata del arzobispo de Sucre, monseñor Ricardo Centellas. Está aislado tras presentar síntomas leves de la enfermedad Monseñor Ricardo Centellas, arzobispo de Sucre y vicepresidente de la Conferencia Episcopal Boliviana (CEB), también dio positivo a Covid-19. Sin embargo, solo presenta síntomas leves y se recupera favorablemente en aislamiento. La información fue proporcionada por el encargado de…
        Read More
        はづ別館、なぜ「客が値決めするシステム」は終了したのか…30年間で得た知見 thumbnail

        はづ別館、なぜ「客が値決めするシステム」は終了したのか…30年間で得た知見

        「はづ別館HP」より 現在、広まりつつある、Pay as you wish(Pay as you like/あなたのお好きな価格を支払ってください)という決済システムの、日本における元祖的存在である「はづ別館」。その「はづ別館」を運営する株式会社はづ・代表取締役会長・加藤浩章氏へのインタビューに基づく、連載記事の第3回目である。 ・第1回 『客が値段を決める宿・はづ別館、経営の秘密…客・旅館側、双方の納得感が向上』 ・第2回 『はづ別館、客が値段を決めるシステム導入の驚異的影響…年間120本の取材依頼』  はづ別館の適正価格がいくらなのかは、難しい問題である。しかし、安定した経営を継続していくには、1泊2食付で1万~1万5000円程度以上は必要になると思われる。では、実際に宿泊客が付けた価格はいくらであったのか。  客が値付けするシステムの詳細は、まずチェックイン時に「泊まって、感じたままの価値観で……朝、お書き入れ下さいませ」と書かれた用紙が客に渡される。その用紙に客が価格を書くわけである。また、「感じたままの感想をぜひどうぞ。(お気づきの点、何なりとご記入ください)」という欄もある。裏面には氏名・住所・年齢・職業を記入するようになっている。  ここに記載されている実際の価格を見ると、100円から15万円と幅は極めて大きいものの、平均すると1万円は大きく超えている。ちなみに、15万円など高額な料金を付けた客に対しては、あらかじめ決めている上限の金額を受け取り、超えている部分は受け取らないというルールになっていた。  また、関東・中部・関西など、客の居住地域による価格差という特徴も確認できる。たとえば、関東からの客は全般的に価格が高く、関西からの客は値付けの幅が大きい。加えて、年齢・性別・職業などによる傾向の違いも確認できる。  加藤氏は、このシステムを採用してから30年を経て、人と地域性いうものが本当によくわかるようになったと語っている。  ちなみに、「大変満足だった」と記入しながらも5000円程度の価格を設定する客や、極めて稀ではあるが、冷やかしのような価格を設定する客のリピート利用、低額の常連客の利用に関しては、予約受付の際、はづ別館側から適正と思われる額を提示することもあったという。
        Read More

        Captors release Bangladeshi businessman

        CAPE TOWN - A Bangladeshi businessman who was kidnapped two weeks ago in Mitchells Plain, has been released. READ: CT man killed in attempted kidnapping While the Bangladeshi community in Cape Town is relieved, they say Akthar Prodhan, the owner, of several Cash and Carry stores, has been assaulted and tortured. He's been hospitalised since his
        Read More
        Gluten-Free Red Velvet Cake thumbnail

        Gluten-Free Red Velvet Cake

        Total Time Prep Time: 10 min. Cook Time: 30 min. Makes16 servings Updated: Mar. 08, 2024 Gluten-Free Red Velvet Cake Recipe photo by Taste of Home Ingredients 4 large eggs, room temperature, lightly beaten1-1/2 cups sugar1-1/2 cups 2% milk1/2 cup canola oil2 teaspoons white vinegar2 teaspoons vanilla extract1 to 2 teaspoons red food coloring2-3/4 cups
        Read More
        Benjamín Amadeo was a father: Andes was born, his first daughter thumbnail

        Benjamín Amadeo was a father: Andes was born, his first daughter

        Una gran noticia generó ternura en el ambiente del espectáculo: Benjamín Amadeo fue papá por primera vez. Según confirmó el cantante y actor a LA NACION, este sábado nació Andes, la bebé fruto de su relación con Martina, su pareja desde 2015.El parto tuvo lugar en el Sanatorio Otamendi de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires.…
        Read More
        Index Of News
        Total
        0
        Share