Should You Swab Your Throat for a Rapid COVID Test?

Image for article titled Should You Swab Your Throat for a Rapid COVID Test?

Photo: Basilico Studio Stock (Shutterstock)

At-home rapid tests for COVID-19 instruct you to stir a cotton swab inside each nostril before sliding the swab into its little testing tube or card. But some people have posted pictures on social media comparing a negative at-home nasal swab with a positive at-home throat swab, and even some experts are saying that the throat swabs are more likely to pick up an early infection. But the real story is a bit more complicated.

You see, the at-home tests were only validated for nasal samples. If they turn out to be able to reliably detect the COVID virus in throat swab samples, that would be great—but we don’t know yet if we can rely on those results. To understand what’s going on with the throat swab situation, I called Susan Butler-Wu, a clinical microbiologist at the University of Southern California whose work focuses on tests for infectious disease.

A throat swab, Butler-Wu says, “is going to be right some of the time; but what percentage of the time is it wrong?” The only way to know would be to do a study comparing this new way of testing with the results you get from other tests. “In the laboratory when we come up with a new test, we don’t just start using it. We have to validate it and make sure that it works, and that there are no interfering substances.”

The specifics matter

Tests can produce unreliable results when you use them in a different way than they were designed to handle. For example, students figured out that cola and fruit juice can trick rapid tests into delivering a “positive” result.

If you drank a Coke right before taking your throat swab, could that throw off the results? Maybe! It’s also possible that the cells or chemical compounds that are naturally present in your throat might behave differently in the test than the ones in your nose. We don’t have enough data to say for sure. Maybe the throat swabs are more reliable—that’s possible!—but it’s also possible that they’re less reliable.

Just because a bunch of people have posted their throat and nose swabs to TikTok and Twitter does not mean that the scientific community has seen enough evidence to conclude that throat swabs are your best bet. “We can’t practice lab medicine by anecdotes,” Butler-Wu says. “We need data.”

The reason rapid tests started using nasal swabs instead of throat swabs in the first place was that, earlier in the pandemic, data comparing the two found that the nasal swabs were more likely to pick up the virus. That may have changed with Omicron, and some early data suggests that it has, but it’s too soon to conclude that we need to change our testing protocols. (And remember, Omicron isn’t the only variant out there.)

Tests also differ from brand to brand in how sensitive they are, and in the exact chemistry they use to detect the virus. So even if one brand of test would turn out to be pretty reliable when used with throat swabs, that doesn’t guarantee that the same would be true of others.

And one more complicating factor: We’re having a COVID surge right now. If throat swabs were likely to produce false positives—which, again, we don’t know for sure—those would be overwhelmed by all the real positives. You’re positive, I’m positive, everybody’s positive! But later on, when the surge is over, any given positive would be more likely to be a false positive. (If this sounds confusing, we have a little explainer here. It’s about a different type of test but the underlying issue is the same.) So it may not be a good idea to draw conclusions from recent anecdotes and expect everything to behave the same way in the future.

So what should you do?

I wrote to a few of the rapid test manufacturers, and got brief responses back that pointed out that their tests are FDA-authorized for nasal samples only. As you might expect, the FDA itself has taken the stance that tests should only be used as authorized, no matter how promising the throat swab situation may look. Abbott, the maker of the BinaxNOW tests I saw in so many social media posts comparing nose and throat samples, said in their email that “To help ensure accurate test results, [it] is important to follow the instructions for use.”

Butler-Wu says that if you do a throat swab, or a combined nose-and-throat swab, it’s important to understand that the results may not be accurate. If your test is positive, she says, “I would seek confirmatory testing but assume I have COVID until I get the test back.” Likewise, if your test is negative, you shouldn’t assume that you’re in the clear; rapid tests miss a lot of real infections, especially early on.

In addition, you should be aware that things you eat and drink could potentially affect the results of a throat swab. Since nobody has done a study on exactly how much cola you would have to drink to throw off a test, instructions for throat-swab tests (which do exist for other testing protocols) typically ask you not to eat or drink for at least 30 minutes before taking your swab.

“The issue is, we can’t base recommendations on anecdotes,” Butler-Wu told me. There’s just not enough data to know how reliable throat swabs really are. So if you choose to do one anyway, you should know those limitations.

Note: This article have been indexed to our site. We do not claim legitimacy, ownership or copyright of any of the content above. To see the article at original source Click Here

Related Posts
Solaseed, 2021 scheduled arrival rate is No. 1 in the LCC category in the world British Cirium survey thumbnail

Solaseed, 2021 scheduled arrival rate is No. 1 in the LCC category in the world British Cirium survey

 航空分野の情報を提供する英Cirium(シリウム)による2021年の定時到着率調査で、ソラシドエア(SNJ/6J)がLCC(低コスト航空会社)部門の世界1位を初めて獲得した。ソラシドはLCCではないが、Ciriumでは単一機種による運航など効率的な経営を取り入れている航空会社をLCC部門に分類している。 Ciriumの調査で2021年定時到着率がLCC部門世界1位となったソラシドエア=PHOTO: Tadayuki YOSHIKAWA/Aviation Wire  新型コロナウイルス感染症(COVID-19)の影響による旅客減を考慮し、2021年は6月から12月までの運航実績を対象にした。ソラシドの定時到着率は97.93%だった。  LCC部門の全世界2位はスターフライヤー(SFJ/7G、9206)の97.75%、3位はタイ・エアアジア(AIQ/FD)の95.45%だった。また、国内勢ではエア・ドゥ(ADO/HD)も95.45%で5位にランクインしている。  日本では、LCCは低コストによる低価格運賃という特徴から「格安航空会社」という訳語が充てられることが多いが、正確には「Low Cost Carrier」の名の通り、低コストを実現するビジネスモデルを取り入れた航空会社を指す。  全日本空輸(ANA/NH)や日本航空(JAL/JL、9201)などFSC(フルサービス航空会社)も早期割引運賃などでLCC並みか下回る運賃を提供したり、逆にLCCが繁忙期などにFSCを上回る価格を設定することもあり、運賃だけに着目して訳語を充てるのはLCCの業態説明として不適切な面もある。一方で、新聞は文字数の制約を大きく受けるため、LCCの特徴を端的に示すものとして6文字で済む「格安航空会社」が定着したと言える。 関連リンクCiriumソラシドエア ・ANA、2021年の定時到着率世界1位 英Cirium調査(22年1月5日) ・ソラシド、初日の出・初詣フライト2年ぶり開催(22年1月2日) ・エア・ドゥとソラシド、持ち株会社設立で22年10月経営統合 独立性は維持(21年5月31日) ・エア・ドゥとソラシド、”中小企業”に 第三者割当増資後に減資(21年5月31日)
Read More
The war for science is gaining momentum: confidence in science must be restored in order to save democracy and the future of humanity thumbnail

The war for science is gaining momentum: confidence in science must be restored in order to save democracy and the future of humanity

האמונה במדע הפכה מבסיס ההחלטות הדמוקרטיות לעניין פוליטי. חוקרים שבחנו את התהליכים מנסים להסביר איך הגענו למצב זה ומה צריך לעשות כדי לעצור את התופעה * מדובר בקואליציה שבה אנשי תעשיית הנפט מממנים מכחישי מדעים אחרים בנוסף למדע האקלים, ובמיוחד, דורשים מהם להפסיק להאמין בכל מה שמגיע מפי מדענים. אם לא נפסיק את התהליך, נחזור…
Read More
China Establishes First Fast-Charging Association: A Standard Will Be Established thumbnail

China Establishes First Fast-Charging Association: A Standard Will Be Established

Çin’de hızlı şarj teknolojisinde bir standart oluşturmak ve elektrik israfının önüne geçilmesi için Terminal Endüstrisi Derneği kuruldu. Günümüzde çoğu cep telefonu ve akıllı elektronik cihazlar için hızlı şarj olmazsa olmaz bir özellik haline geldi. Xiaomi, Huawei gibi Çin merkezli şirketler başta olmak üzere pek çok üretici hızlı şarj teknolojisinden yararlanıyor. Ancak elektronik cihazlarda her zaman…
Read More
חוקרים מאוניברסיטת תל אביב: הצלחנו לגדל חוט שדרה במעבדה thumbnail

חוקרים מאוניברסיטת תל אביב: הצלחנו לגדל חוט שדרה במעבדה

אם ניסויים קליניים בעתיד ישחזרו את ההצלחה בעכברים, מדובר בפריצת דרך שייתכן ותאפשר לאנשים משותקים לחזור ולעמוד על הרגליים רשת נוירונים (צילום: מרכז סגול לביוטכנולוגיה רגנרטיבית) האם היום שבו אנשים משותקים יוכלו לעמוד על רגליהם ולצעוד מחדש קרוב משחשבנו? בפעם הראשונה בעולם חוקרים ממרכז סגול לביוטכנולוגיה רגנרטיבית באוניברסיטת תל אביב הצליחו להנדס חוט שדרה אנושי…
Read More
Index Of News
Total
0
Share