Space Force in discussions with industry on future market for space surveillance data

by

A software suite from ExoAnalytic integrates space data from multiple sensors. Credit: ExoAnalytic Solutions

Companies in the space domain awareness market are eager to work with the Space Force but need a clearer picture of future demand

WASHINGTON — The head of U.S. Space Systems Command Lt. Gen. Michael Guetlein has directed the command’s procurement offices to “buy what we can and only build what we must.” 

One area of interest is space domain awareness, or SDA. The Space Force wants to supplement its own intelligence with data from commercial companies to help satellite operators identify potential threats in orbit. 

F Schnell, senior materiel leader for space domain awareness at Space Systems Command, said in an interview Oct. 1 that many companies in the SDA market are eager to work with the Space Force but need a clearer picture of future demand.

“They have to tell their investors what they’re investing against,” Schnell told SpaceNews. “We need to tell them what we see coming down the pipeline.”

Companies in this sector of the industry operate ground and space-based sensors that track objects in all orbits, and use artificial intelligence algorithms to analyze the data. 

During a keynote speech last week at the Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies (AMOS) conference in Hawaii, Guetlein said SSC spent about $134 million on commercial space domain awareness products over the past two years. 

But the command has yet to map out a forecast for future years so it can “advertise that number to the investors,” Schnell said.

During the AMOS event, Schnell and other SSC officials held one-on-one meetings with dozens of private companies.

“Everybody we met had questions about what does that market look like?” he said. “We need to scope that out.”

Col. Marc Brock, commander of Space Delta 2, the Space Force unit responsible for SDA, said there are today technical and cultural hurdles that prevent widespread use of commercial data. 

“We need to integrate and exploit nontraditional commercial data,” Brock said at the AMOS conference. “But there has been a push against this to a certain extent within our own enterprise, and I’ve been pushing back on that.”

“We need our commercial partners,” he said. “We need the data that you have and we need to figure out how to use that data.”

The commercial data that the Space Force uses today is uploaded to a repository known as the Unified Data Library. But the communications systems that Space Delta 2 uses to move that data are very slow, he said. The unit also needs tools to validate the accuracy and consistency of the data. 

Schnell said SSC is helping Space Delta 2 address some of these issues. “The use of commercial data is still relatively new,” he said. “How do we give operators confidence that commercial data is as good as that from our exquisite sensors?”

Analytics tools needed

Guetlein in his speech at AMOS cited recent comments by Gen. Glen VanHerck, commander of the North American Aerospace Defense Command, who said most of the domain awareness data available today is “left on the cutting room floor” and not even analyzed. 

That’s because data collected by military sensors for the most part is classified, managed in stovepipes and not shared, VanHerck said during a panel discussion Sept. 21 at the Air, Space & Cyber conference. 

To solve this problem, Guetlein said “we have to free the data.”

Over the years, he said, “we have put so many constraints on the data, so many rules on what you can look at, what you can’t look at.”

With regard to Brock’s issues with data transmissions, Guetlein agreed that “we need better comm pipes. We are still traveling over the old copper lines that were built back in the 60s. We’ve got to get past that.”

“And I’ve got to lower the classification level,” he said. “All we’re doing is hiding from ourselves. We’ve got to start having the critical conversations and open up the dialogue.”

The acquisition model Guetlein is pushing, to “exploit what we have, buy what we can, and build only what we must requires a culture change,” he said. 

“Our operators have to know they can count on the commercial data,” he added. “In places like Ukraine, the data will flow. So we’re working on a culture change.”

Note: This article have been indexed to our site. We do not claim legitimacy, ownership or copyright of any of the content above. To see the article at original source Click Here

Related Posts
Best Delta 8 Gummies: Top 25 in 2022 thumbnail

Best Delta 8 Gummies: Top 25 in 2022

This site contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.Delta 8 has been making waves in the cannabis market. Some of the most popular gummy edibles at the moment feature this beneficial compound.  So what is Delta 8 exactly? The simple answer is that it’s closely related to Delta 9 THC, which…
Read More
Fine-tuning epigenome editors thumbnail

Fine-tuning epigenome editors

For the raft of new ventures developing epigenome editors, a compelling niche may be diseases of haploinsufficiency or genome imprinting that require exquisite control of gene expression. In recent months, three biotech startups — Chroma Medicine, Tune Therapeutics, and Navega Therapeutics — have raised $167 million in funding, joining Sangamo Therapeutics and Encoded Therapeutics in…
Read More
Greengenes2 unifies microbial data in a single reference tree thumbnail

Greengenes2 unifies microbial data in a single reference tree

Brief Communication Open Access Published: 27 July 2023 Daniel McDonald1, Yueyu Jiang2, Metin Balaban3, Kalen Cantrell4, Qiyun Zhu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3568-62715,6, Antonio Gonzalez1, James T. Morton7, Giorgia Nicolaou8, Donovan H. Parks  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6662-90109, Søren M. Karst10, Mads Albertsen  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6151-190X11, Philip Hugenholtz  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5386-79259, Todd DeSantis12, Se Jin Song13, Andrew Bartko  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1237-274713, Aki S. Havulinna 
Read More
We Asked a NASA Scientist: Are Wildfires Getting Worse? [Video] thumbnail

We Asked a NASA Scientist: Are Wildfires Getting Worse? [Video]

The Camp Fire wildfire in 2018 burned a total of 239 square miles, destroyed 18,804 structures and killed 85 people. Researchers say it also produced lingering brain trauma in some of those exposed to the deadliest and most destructive wildfire in California history. Credit: National Institute of Standards and TechnologyAre wildfires getting worse?Yes, unfortunately, they
Read More
Index Of News