Expressen’s revelation that a wanted woman without a residence permit was detained at Magdalena Andersson’s address has sparked a discussion about the responsibility for the Prime Minister’s security.
Now Säpo announces that it understands that the media reporting on the incident raises questions.
– Regarding the incident reported in the media, the Security Police will of course handle it based on factual circumstances. We will also review whether there is a need for rule changes, which we will then return with, says Charlotte von Essen, head of security police, in a press release.
The week before Christmas the police rushed to Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson’s home in Nacka after an alarm was triggered in the home . There were two people on site who were there to clean at Andersson’s.
One, a woman in her 25s, lacked a Swedish residence permit, had a final rejection decision and was wanted.
Expressen’s revelation has raised critical questions about the security routines around the head of government .
Security Chief Johan Wiktorin wrote on Twitter:
“Are not responsible on their toes in this world situation ?? How can a person who is here illegally be allowed to clean up with our Prime Minister? And from Nicaragua, whose relations with Russia are, to say the least, good in intelligence contexts. Who is responsible? ”
The security expert:“ Scandal ”
Security expert Dick Malmlund believes that the Security Police can not absolve themselves of responsibility, and that those who carry out assignments in the private home are included in the protection of the Prime Minister.
– Säpo says that it is not their job , and if it’s not, then it’s a scandal, of course. And if it is, then it is also a scandal. No matter how you twist and turn it, this is deplorable.
He himself works with security in the business world, and says that people who are to be protected there in advance would announce who they want to hire.
– They send a name of a company, and then we check it out properly with taxes and people in management. Then we come down to the person who will come to the person in question, where we do a real research on the person and surroundings. And then you hear that you step right in with the Prime Minister when you are expelled, it is inconceivable.
Säpo: Understand that it “raises questions”
Säpo’s communications manager Nina Odermalm Schei said on Friday that it is not the authority’s task to control people who are to perform work at the homes of people in the central government.
On Sunday, Security Police Chief Charlotte von Essen will announce that Säpo is acting, and will “review whether there is a need for rule changes.”
– I can understand that as it has been reported about the incident, it raises questions . For the Security Police, it is not possible to go into details when it comes to the security of our security personnel, but of course the Prime Minister’s security is of the highest priority, she says in the press release.
The message: Säpo will “look at what happened”
During the day, Nina Odermalm Schei also developed her answer about Säpo’s work. She says that the authority has continuous contact with the Government Offices about the Prime Minister’s security.
– It is an ongoing and good dialogue. As far as the Prime Minister’s security is concerned, we are constantly working on various measures, she says.
– Based on what has emerged, we will now have a continued dialogue with the Government Offices’ security organization to look at what happened.
Were you informed by the open police that this had happened, when it happened?
– We have a close dialogue with the Police Authority, but exactly what information is provided, how, when and where, we do not go into it.
But when you say “what has come out”, do you still mean what has come out now?
– Yes, exactly, what has emerged now.
About the discussion that has arisen about the responsibility for controlling people who work at home with protected persons, says Nina Odermalm Schei :
– It is not really our job to comment on it.
If it is not in your interest that the protected persons are helped to think correctly about their own safety et, even in the parts that are outside your direct area of responsibility?
– We have a dialogue with all our protected persons. We have safety talks, for example, where you go through important issues. But I do not want to go into more detail on this particular case.
Note: This article have been indexed to our site. We do not claim legitimacy, ownership or copyright of any of the content above. To see the article at original source Click Here