What the Supreme Court’s decision on vaccine mandates means for Americans

The U.S. Supreme Court on January 13, 2022, blocked the Biden administration’s vaccine-or-test mandate, which applied to virtually all private companies with 100 of more employees. But it left in place a narrower mandate that requires health care workers at facilities receiving federal funds to get vaccinated. The ruling comes at a time when the number of COVID-19 cases and hospitalization rates continues to soar throughout the US as a result of the omicron variant.

We asked Debbie Kaminer, a professor of law at Baruch College, CUNY, to explain the ruling’s impact.

What did the Supreme Court decide?

The court’s six conservative justices held that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration exceeded its power in issuing the mandate on private companies, which would have covered about 80 million workers.

The majority opinion distinguished between workplace safety and occupational health, determining that “although COVID-19 is a risk that occurs in many workplaces, it is not an occupational hazard in most,” as it can spread wherever people gather. The majority also expressed concern that the mandate was a “blunt instrument” and did not distinguish “based on industry or risk of exposure to COVID-19.”

The three liberal judges dissented, arguing that “COVID-19 poses special risks in most workplaces, across the country and across industries.”

At the same time, by a narrower 5-4 vote, the Supreme Court allowed continued enforcement of a mandate requiring health care workers at facilities that receive government funding through Medicare or Medicaid to be vaccinated. According to the court, this mandate by the Department of Health and Human Services “fits neatly” within the congressional power given to the agency because of the increased risk associated with health care workers becoming ill with COVID-19 and infecting their patients.

How does this affect other worker mandates?

Despite this Supreme Court ruling, many types of COVID-19 vaccine mandates remain legally enforceable and continue to be an important tool in ensuring Americans get vaccinated.

Approximately half of all states have some type of vaccination mandate, and the enforceability of these mandates is not affected by the court’s latest decision. While the Supreme Court limited the authority of administrative agencies, this does not affect the ability of state and local governments to pass laws regulating the health and safety of the public. These mandates most commonly cover health care workers and government employees, while some cover all employees. New York City, for example, recently passed a mandate covering most employees who work in person or interact with the public, and this mandate is not affected by the court’s decision.

Some states and localities have also issued vaccine mandates covering customers in public spaces. For example, New York City has broadly mandated the vaccine at most indoor venues, including restaurants, gyms, and theaters.

Many private businesses, on their own authority, require employees to get vaccinated. This includes major companies such as Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, Delta Airlines, Google, and CVS. The ruling doesn’t affect their legal ability to impose such mandates—though it may make companies that had been mulling a mandate less likely to institute one for their workers.

In all, about 36 percent of US workers are required by their employers to get vaccinated, according to Society for Human Resource Management, an industry group.

How about school mandates?

Educational institutions also continue to play an important role in mandating COVID-19 vaccination, and this is not affected by the court’s decision.

Over 1,000 universities have some form of vaccine mandate, and in August 2021 the Supreme Court refused to block Indiana University’s mandate. Unlike the OSHA case, this did not involve the authority of an administrative agency.

Additionally, as a result of the omicron outbreak, a growing number of universities are now also requiring students, faculty, and staff to get the COVID-19 booster.

Some public school districts have mandated the vaccine for teachers and other school employees. At least two states, California and Louisiana, have mandated the vaccine for students, but both states have said they will not enforce the mandate until the 2022-2023 school year, and even then, only if the vaccine has full FDA authorization for children.

While COVID-19 vaccine mandates in public schools may be challenged, proof of immunization for other diseases, such as measles, are nothing new. As such, I believe there is a strong chance that COVID-19 vaccine mandates for schools will generally be upheld as constitutional. Before the pandemic, all 50 states already had in place some form of vaccine mandate for schoolchildren.

Will this affect the government’s ability to protect public health?

The court’s decision is significant in that it limits the authority of government administrative agencies generally, and specifically limits the power of OSHA to protect public health.

Still, this decision will not meaningfully restrain the government’s ability to fight pandemics more generally, as federal statutes, state and local vaccine mandates, public university mandates and public K-12 school mandates are not affected by the decision.

The Supreme Court essentially determined that because the risk of COVID-19 exists both within as well as outside the workplace, OSHA does not have the authority to generally protect employees across workplaces. In doing so, the majority essentially determined that the court—and not OSHA—is the institution that should make health policy and decide which workplaces are high enough risk that a vaccine mandate is appropriate.

The dissenting justices responded with incredulity: “In the face of a still-raging pandemic, this court tells the agency charged with protecting safety that it cannot respond in the most effective way possible. Without legal basis, the court usurps a decision that rightfully belongs to others.”

The majority did recognize, however, that “where the virus poses a special danger because of the particular features of an employee’s job or workplace, targeted regulations are plainly permissible.”

It remains to be seen how narrow a government agency mandate must be to be upheld by the Supreme Court.

While the majority of Americans are already fully vaccinated, and approximately 75 percent of all Americans have received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, mandates will likely remain an important tool in continuing to fight the pandemic.

The Conversation

Note: This article have been indexed to our site. We do not claim legitimacy, ownership or copyright of any of the content above. To see the article at original source Click Here

Related Posts
Paleontologists Identify New Species of Saber-Toothed Cat thumbnail

Paleontologists Identify New Species of Saber-Toothed Cat

The newly-identified species — the earliest and most primitive member of the saber-toothed cat genus Amphimachairodus — had craniodental adaptations to social behavior and open environment. An artist’s reconstruction of two Amphimachairodus hezhengensis defending their prey (Hezhengia bohlini) from two Dinocrocuta gigantea. Image credit: Oscar Sanisidro. Amphimachairodus hezhengensis lived in what is now northern China
Read More
China calls for space station commercial cargo proposals thumbnail

China calls for space station commercial cargo proposals

HELSINKI — China’s human spaceflight agency is seeking to foster a commercial, low-cost transportation system to deliver cargo to and from its Tiangong space station. The China Manned Space Engineering Office (CMSEO) announced May 16 that it is seeking to reduce the cost and enhance the flexibility of sending supplies to Tiangong through exploring the
Read More
Sensor-Equipped Seals Uncover New Seawater Pathways Around Antarctica thumbnail

Sensor-Equipped Seals Uncover New Seawater Pathways Around Antarctica

New research highlights how meltwater from Antarctic ice shelves, driven by climate change, affects neighboring ice shelves via ocean currents. This interconnected system, studied using innovative methods including sensor-equipped seals, is crucial for understanding and predicting sea level rise. Credit: Andy Thompson Researchers have discovered that the meltwater from Antarctic ice shelves, exacerbated by climate
Read More
Which foods boost the immune system? thumbnail

Which foods boost the immune system?

Home References (Image credit: Getty Images) Can foods boost the immune system? If this thought has ever crossed your mind, you’re not alone. When it comes to preventing infections, we roughly know the drill. Wash your hands thoroughly. Sanitize surfaces. Stay home if you’re not feeling well. But many of us remain unsure as to…
Read More
JAL, lounge beef curry resale specifications remain unchanged thumbnail

JAL, lounge beef curry resale specifications remain unchanged

 日本航空(JAL/JL、9201)の通販サイト「JALショッピング」を運営するJALUX(ジャルックス、2729)は、羽田と成田両空港の国際線ラウンジで提供している「JAL特製オリジナルビーフカレー」の販売を1月13日から再開した。在庫がなくなり次第終了する。 JAL特製オリジナルビーフカレー=PHOTO: Tadayuki YOSHIKAWA/Aviation Wire  1kg x 2袋を6800円(税・送料込)で販売。1袋は200gのレトルトカレー換算で5食分に相当する。1袋あたりの寸法は約27cm×19cm×高さ2cmで、実際にラウンジで使用している冷凍保存のカレーがそのまま届く。  同サイトの商品レビューには2021年7月以降「肉が硬い」「脂身が多い」など、以前とカレーの仕様が異なるのではないかとの意見が一部寄せられている。  JALUXによると、同様の問い合わせが電話や電子メールでも寄せられているが「原料・製造工程の変更はなく通常通りの仕様」だという。「牛肉には個体差もありますが、お客さまからのコメントは真摯に受け止め、よりご満足いただけるものをご提供するべく努めて参ります」と話していた。  JALは、新型コロナウイルス感染症(COVID-19)の影響で国際線が大量運休となった2020年、ビーフカレーを8月27日から11月30日までJALショッピングで販売。JALが広く一般に自社でこのカレーを販売したのは初めてだった。その後、2021年4月から在庫限りで不定期に販売してきたが、7月以降は1カ月に1回程度は販売できるようにしていた。 関連リンクJAL特製オリジナルビーフカレー日本航空 ・JALラウンジ特製ビーフカレーが我が家にやってきた 1袋1kgって何食分?(20年9月10日) ・JAL系レストラン御料鶴、CAが機内食提供(20年11月12日) ・JALラウンジのビーフカレー、初のレストラン提供 成田空港近く「御料鶴」(20年6月12日)
Read More
Protons are probably actually smaller than previously thought thumbnail

Protons are probably actually smaller than previously thought

In the 1990s, protons were thought to be 0.88 femtometers. But a new study by the University of Bonn and the Technical University of Darmstadt suggests that the protons are probably actually smaller than assumed since the 1990s.  This discovery comes as a surprise to the scientific community- some researchers even believed that the Standard…
Read More
Index Of News
Total
0
Share