BoE warns of potential ‘sharp’ correction in markets

The Bank of England is seen in London December 12, 2017. — Reuters file pic
The Bank of England is seen in London December 12, 2017. — Reuters file pic

LONDON, Oct 8 — Financial markets, which have rebounded recently on low global interest rates and vast economic stimulus during the coronavirus pandemic, could be in for a “sharp” correction, the Bank of England warned today. 

Investors have increased their exposure to riskier assets such as equities in view of the brighter economic outlook. 

But they could be forced to reassess their positions, the BoE’s Financial Policy Committee, which is tasked with safeguarding the financial system, warned in a new report.

Like other central banks around the world, including the US Federal Reserve, the BoE launched a massive asset-purchasing programme, buying up corporate bonds, that helped to fuel a rally in global markets. 

“Following the Covid shock, central banks cut interest rates and undertook asset purchases to support economic activity and prevent an unwarranted tightening of financial conditions for corporates and households,” the FPC’s financial stability report said.

“Since then, risky asset prices have increased and, in a number of markets, asset valuations appear elevated relative to historical norms.”

Those valuations “could correct sharply if, for example, market participants re‐evaluate the prospects for growth, inflation or interest rates,” it said.

Markets are on edge over the inflation outlook, as consumer prices soar on the back of economic reopening, supply chain problems, runaway energy costs and other commodity prices.

The FPC pointed to “signs of continued loosening in underwriting standards and increased risk-taking in some investment banking businesses”.

And those risks “can affect UK financial stability through the direct impact on banks and the indirect impact of losses spreading through other parts of the global financial system”, it said. 

However, the FPC said the core UK banking system was “resilient” to such losses.

Central banks are now grappling with how and when to withdraw ultra-loose monetary policy and massive stimulus programmes.

The US Federal Reserve in September indicated it would start tapering its massive bond-buying programme by the end of the year.

The Bank of England has so far left its stimulus unchanged, but there were signs of dissent at its most recent policy meeting, when two of its rate-setting panel voted to stop the bond-buying stimulus as soon as possible to help quell inflation.

But the other seven members, including governor Andrew Bailey, voted for no change. — AFP

Note: This article have been indexed to our site. We do not claim legitimacy, ownership or copyright of any of the content above. To see the article at original source Click Here

Related Posts
Vietnam and the virus coexist epidemic classification is no longer determined by the number of confirmed cases thumbnail

Vietnam and the virus coexist epidemic classification is no longer determined by the number of confirmed cases

越南工廠,員工在進廠前先檢測體溫。   圖 : 翻攝自騰訊網 越南防疫思維從先前的「清零」變成「與病毒共存」。越南衛生部近日表示,將停止依據單日新增確診數來評估COVID-19疫情,而是參考住院與死亡人數。 越南衛生部副部長阮長山(Nguyen Truong Son)近日接受越南快訊(VnExpress)訪問時表示,由於COVID-19(2019冠狀病毒疾病)疫情已經發生巨大變化,越南衛生部正在草擬一套新的標準來區分疫情等級。 他說:「新的標準不會太依賴社區感染率,因為許多省市的輕症與無症狀患者都是在家治療。」 河內感染控制協會副主席阮越雄(Nguyen Viet Hung)也贊同改變標準。他說,在高疫苗覆蓋率的情況下,計算單日新增確診數已經沒什麼重要意義,且還會影響對經濟復甦所做的努力。 他以越南首都河內市為例表示,河內市的社區病例數最近一直成長,許多地區不得不暫停非必要服務,或是不准民眾內用。然而河內市的重症與死亡人數都低於全國平均水準。 報導指出,在1月1日至1月9日之間,河內市的確診數都是全國之冠,但染疫死亡率為0.4%,低於全國的1.3%。 醫學專家陳士俊(Tran Si Tuan)說,越南很難避免讓COVID-19變異病毒Omicron進入社區,Omicron的傳播速度高於Delta變異病毒,如果還是依賴單日新增確診數來評估疫情,許多省市將被認定具「非常高風險」或是「高風險」,這將嚴重影響生產與經營活動。 越南人口總數約9800萬,總確診數15日跨過200萬大關,過去7天平均每天有近1萬6000人感染。 截至目前,越南18歲以上民眾已有逾9成施打兩劑COVID-19疫苗,其中逾一成已注射加強針;全國重症人數從一個月前的平均每天7500人降至目前的6150人。 越南防疫思維從先前的「清零」變成「與病毒共存」。越南衛生部近日表示,將停止依據單日新增確診數來評估COVID-19疫情,而是參考住院與死亡人數。
Read More
Experts analyze the key issues of the US "One China Policy": Do you oppose the peaceful reunification of the two sides of the Taiwan Strait? Do you support the "permanent separation" of Taiwan and China? thumbnail

Experts analyze the key issues of the US “One China Policy”: Do you oppose the peaceful reunification of the two sides of the Taiwan Strait? Do you support the “permanent separation” of Taiwan and China?

2022揭開序幕後美中關係未見好轉,台灣議題依然是華盛頓與北京長期糾結的分歧所在。儘管拜登政府重申美國的「一中政策」不變,但中國官方仍然指責美國試圖「歪曲和掏空一中原則」,近來美國官員關於台海議題的說法也引發一些人質疑,究竟美國對台灣與中國統一的立場是什麼?美國強調「反對台海現狀被單方面改變」的立場是否意在阻止中國統一?美國對台政策是否正在改變?拜登政府是否在採取實質上的「一中一台」政策?[啟動LINE推播] 每日重大新聞通知 美國國防部助理部長拉特納(Ely Ratner)上個月在參議員外委會「未來美國對台政策」聽證會上的證詞中一開始就指出,台灣安全對美國如此重要的原因是「台灣位於第一島鏈重要節點(node),是美國同盟及夥伴網絡的定錨--這個網絡從日本延伸到菲律賓再到南海,它對區域安全非常重要,也是護衛美國在印太地區重要利益的關鍵。」 第一島鏈節點說法引質疑 拉特納這段講話引起外界許多注意,《金融時報》12月28日一篇報導說,拉特納關於台灣對美國的重要性的聲明,與1950年美國駐遠東司令麥克阿瑟將軍(Gen. Douglas MacAthur)稱台灣有如一艘「不沉的航空母艦」,對美國戰略利益極為重要的說法極為相似,拉特納也強調了台灣地理位置的重要性。 報導說,「人們或許會記得,這是一個華盛頓終於坦承它對台灣意圖的時刻。至少在北京,這個聲明被解讀為美國已拋開所有它可能接受台灣與中國統一的偽裝。」 美國學者也對拉特納的說法提出疑問。白宮印太事務協調官坎博(Kurt Campbell)上星期(1月6日)在卡內基國際和平基金會一場對話活動中,就被曾任國務院情報官及歷史學家的主持人米勒(Aaron David Miller)問到這個十分「敏感」的問題。 第一島鏈與第二島鏈(Wikipedia / Public Domain) 美國是否接受「統一」須釐清 米勒說,拉特納有關台灣是第一島鏈重要「節點」,也是美國重要戰略利益的說法,「在我聽來像是一個美國必須遵守的承諾。」他問坎博,「我們是否仍然遵守一個中國政策?就是說,我們理論上能否接受統一,如果它是以和平的方式來實現?我的意思是說,雖然我很難想像如此的情況,但那是否仍然是我們的政策?」 坎博首先承認正如米勒所說,「這是國家政策中一個非常敏感的元素(a very sensitive element of national policy)」,但他沒有直接答覆米勒的提問。他說,他要強調的是,「我們的立場沒有改變,它與以前的做法是一致的。我們致力於維護台海和平穩定。我們確實有一個中國政策。我們支持台海兩岸的和平對話與接觸。我們還致力於努力提高威懾力,以確保更普遍地維護這種和平與穩定。」
Read More
Ingraham: Biden administration hates America too much to run it thumbnail

Ingraham: Biden administration hates America too much to run it

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles! Laura Ingraham said members of President Biden's administration hate the United States too much to be able to run it in Wednesday's opening monologue of "The Ingraham Angle."The Biden team thinks they have a "messaging problem," Ingraham said."Well, the truth is, they're just not good at governing,"…
Read More
Index Of News
Total
0
Share