Extremely high CEO salaries lack moral justification

Image: Rodeo Project Management Software / Unsplash

Society & culture

It is difficult to justify extremely high CEO salaries. In addition, many of the moral reasons that should explain wage differences are far too vague. It shows a dissertation in practical philosophy from the University of Gothenburg. Ever since the financial crisis in 2008, there has been a debate about how CEOs are paid and about the so-called “bonus culture” in the financial world. Some critics say that top executives earn disproportionately more than the average worker. Others argue that it is not the sums themselves that are the problem, but that the financial compensation becomes an incentive for excessive risk-taking in the financial market. Still others say that the top executives have only achieved what is expected of them. Moral right to serve differently? – I have started with the question “What is a fair salary?”, Which several researchers in moral philosophy do, but I go more in depth. It is important to ask why it is morally acceptable for someone to earn more than someone else, says Alexander Andersson, author of the dissertation. He describes the most common ideas about wage setting. Most people probably think that pay gaps can be justified on fairly uncontroversial grounds. Those who contribute the most to the company and society can be said to earn more than others. Another idea is that wage differences are permissible if they are the result of a fair wage negotiation between fully informed and free parties. Wage disparities can also be incentives to increase the productivity and efficiency of employees, or be justified from an equality perspective where well-being or realization of life can be seen as the central currency, which does not necessarily require everyone to have equal income. Difficult to “calculate” fair salary – It is important to analyze these reasons for salary differences as they have been used to criticize and to defend high CEO salaries. But it is extremely complex to “calculate” what someone deserves in a certain sense, and salary negotiations between the CEO and the board often risk being anything but free and balanced. Previous research has also shown that incentive-based wage setting entails more risks than benefits – for example, that short-term thinking is prioritized over a sustainable business model in order to meet the criteria for a bonus payment. In other words, there also seem to be efficiency reasons that speak against extremely high CEO salaries. Are there reasons for high salaries Alexander Andersson also highlights reasons for very high salaries. In one of the articles, co-authored with Professor Joakim Sandberg, they argue that it can be rational for companies to pay high salaries when many other companies do.

Then you assume a comparative perspective, where the important thing is to get paid at least as much as everyone else instead of what you deserve in any absolute sense. More philosophical work is required – But my conclusion is that the extreme wage setting is difficult to justify, however, the question remains how large the wage differences should be from a moral perspective. The reason for the latter lies in the weakness and ambiguity of many of the moral reasons we usually give for pay differences. More philosophical work is required here, especially regarding the concept of earnings, in order to be able to say something precise about what is an appropriate wage setting, says Alexander Andersson.

His dissertation also shows that more interdisciplinary collaboration is needed.
– Economists need to incorporate more moral-philosophical thinking when they theorize about CEO salaries. And philosophers need to lift their heads from the books and see how well their theories can be applied to the “real world.” More contacts between the disciplines would definitely have benefited future research, says Alexander Andersson.

Dissertation: Giving Executives Their Due: Just Pay, Desert, and Equality Contact:

Alexander Andersson, Department of Philosophy, Linguistics and Theory of Science, University of Gothenburg, alexander.andersson@gu.se .

Note: This article has been indexed to our site. We do not claim legitimacy, ownership or copyright of any of the content above. To see the article at original source Click Here

Related Posts
Who The World Follows thumbnail

Who The World Follows

We might not be traveling as much as we used at the moment, but that doesn’t mean that we can’t explore what’s happening in the world around us from the comfort of our own homes. Travel Department has conducted some research to create an interactive world map highlighting the top influencers from around the world.…
Read More
MHI launches Inmarsat’s first dual-band satellite thumbnail

MHI launches Inmarsat’s first dual-band satellite

by Jason Rainbow — December 22, 2021 MHI's H-2A workhorse rocket launched Inmarsat-6 F1 Dec. 22 from Japan’s Tanegashima Space Center. Credit: Inmarsat/Mitsubishi Heavy Industries TAMPA, Fla. — Inmarsat’s first dual-band telecommunications satellite launched Dec. 22 aboard Mitsubishi Heavy Industries’ H-2A rocket.  The rocket lifted off from Japan’s Tanegashima Space Center at 10:32 a.m. Eastern…
Read More
James Webb Space Telescope completes tricky sunshield deployment thumbnail

James Webb Space Telescope completes tricky sunshield deployment

Home News On Jan. 4, 2022, engineers successfully deployed the James Webb Space Telescope sunshield, shown here during its final deployment test on Earth in December 2020 at Northrop Grumman in Redondo Beach, California. The tennis court-sized sunshield will protect the telescope from heat. (Image credit: NASA/Chris Gunn) The James Webb Space Telescope has successfully…
Read More
JTA、12月旅客0.6%増17万人 利用率57.0% thumbnail

JTA、12月旅客0.6%増17万人 利用率57.0%

 日本トランスオーシャン航空(JTA/NU)と琉球エアーコミューター(RAC)、日本航空(JAL/JL、9201)沖縄支店、日本エアコミューター(JAC/JC)による、2021年12月の輸送実績速報値によると、JTAの旅客数は17万967人(前年同月比0.6%増)、提供座席数は29万9805席(8.6%減)、ロードファクター(座席利用率、L/F)は57.0%(5.2ポイント上昇)だった。 21年12月の利用率が57.0%だったJTA=PHOTO: Tadayuki YOSHIKAWA/Aviation Wire  4社合計では、旅客数が これより先は会員の方のみご覧いただけます。 無料会員は、有料記事を月あたり3記事まで無料でご覧いただけます。有料会員は、すべての有料記事をご覧いただけます。 会員の方はログインしてご覧ください。ご登録のない方は、無料会員登録すると続きをお読みいただけます。 無料会員として登録後、有料会員登録も希望する方は、会員用ページよりログイン後、有料会員登録をお願い致します。 * 会員には、無料個人会員および有料個人会員、有料法人会員の3種類ございます。  これらの会員になるには、最初に無料会員としての登録が必要です。 購読料はこちらをご覧ください。 * 有料会員と無料会員、非会員の違いは下記の通りです。・有料会員:会員限定記事を含む全記事を閲覧可能・無料会員:会員限定記事は月3本まで閲覧可能・非会員:会員限定記事以外を閲覧可能 * 法人会員登録は、こちらからお問い合わせください。* 法人の会員登録は有料のみです。
Read More
Scientists solved an 80-year-old mystery in static electricity thumbnail

Scientists solved an 80-year-old mystery in static electricity

Charging of dielectrics on contact and separation has puzzled scientists and engineers for centuries. However, a body of evidence has been mounting that contact electrification can also produce heterogeneous charge distributions in the form of (+/-) charge mosaics on each of the surfaces—yet, despite many attempts, no predictive model explaining the formation of mosaics at
Read More
Index Of News
Total
0
Share