Society & culture
Then you assume a comparative perspective, where the important thing is to get paid at least as much as everyone else instead of what you deserve in any absolute sense. More philosophical work is required – But my conclusion is that the extreme wage setting is difficult to justify, however, the question remains how large the wage differences should be from a moral perspective. The reason for the latter lies in the weakness and ambiguity of many of the moral reasons we usually give for pay differences. More philosophical work is required here, especially regarding the concept of earnings, in order to be able to say something precise about what is an appropriate wage setting, says Alexander Andersson.
His dissertation also shows that more interdisciplinary collaboration is needed.
– Economists need to incorporate more moral-philosophical thinking when they theorize about CEO salaries. And philosophers need to lift their heads from the books and see how well their theories can be applied to the “real world.” More contacts between the disciplines would definitely have benefited future research, says Alexander Andersson.
Dissertation: Giving Executives Their Due: Just Pay, Desert, and Equality Contact:
Alexander Andersson, Department of Philosophy, Linguistics and Theory of Science, University of Gothenburg, alexander.andersson@gu.se .
Note: This article has been indexed to our site. We do not claim legitimacy, ownership or copyright of any of the content above. To see the article at original source Click Here