Half of unvaccinated workers say they’d rather quit than get a shot

Image of a syringe and COVID-19 vaccine.

(Image credit: Andriy Onufriyenko via Getty Images)

Are workplace vaccine mandates prompting some employees to quit rather than get a shot?

A hospital in Lowville, New York, for example, had to shut down its maternity ward when dozens of staffers left their jobs rather than get vaccinated. At least 125 employees at Indiana University Health resigned after refusing to take the vaccine.

And several surveys have shown that as many as half of unvaccinated workers insist they would leave their jobs if forced to get the shot, which has raised alarms among some that more mandates could lead to an exodus of workers in many industries.

But how many will actually follow through?

Strong words

In June 2021, we conducted a nationwide survey, funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, that gave us a sample of 1,036 people who mirrored the diverse makeup of the U.S. We plan to publish the survey in October.

We asked respondents to tell us what they would do if “vaccines were required” by their employer. We prompted them with several possible actions, and they could check as many as they liked.

We found that 16% of employed respondents would quit, start looking for other employment or both if their employer instituted a mandate. Among those who said they were “vaccine hesitant” – almost a quarter of respondents – we found that 48% would quit or look for another job.

Other polls have shown similar results. A Kaiser Family Foundation survey put the share of workers who would quit at 50%.

Separately, we found in our survey that 63% of all workers said a vaccine mandate would make them feel safer.

Quieter actions

But while it is easy and cost-free to tell a pollster you’ll quit your job, actually doing so when it means losing a paycheck you and your family may depend upon is another matter.

And based on a sample of companies that already have vaccine mandates in place, the actual number who do resign rather than get the vaccine is much smaller than the survey data suggest.

Houston Methodist Hospital, for example, required its 25,000 workers to get a vaccine by June 7. Before the mandate, about 15% of its employees were unvaccinated. By mid-June, that percentage had dropped to 3% and hit 2% by late July. A total of 153 workers were fired or resigned, while another 285 were granted medical or religious exemptions and 332 were allowed to defer it.

At Jewish Home Family in Rockleigh, New Jersey, only five of its 527 workers quit following its vaccine mandate. Two out of 250 workers left Westminster Village in Bloomington, Illinois, and even in deeply conservative rural Alabama, a state with one of the lowest vaccine uptake rates, Hanceville Nursing & Rehab Center lost only six of its 260 employees.

Delta Airlines didn’t mandate a shot, but in August it did subject unvaccinated workers to a US$200 per month health insurance surcharge. Yet the airline said fewer than 2% of employees have quit over the policy.

And at Indiana University Health, the 125 workers who quit are out of 35,800 total employees, or 0.3%.

Making it easy

Past vaccine mandates, such as for the flu, have led to similar outcomes: Few people actually quit their jobs over them.

And our research suggests in public communications there are a few things employers can do to minimize the number of workers who quit over the policy.

It starts with building trust with employees. Companies should also make it as easy as possible to get vaccinated – such as by providing on-site vaccine drives, paid time off to get the shot and deal with side effects, and support for child care or transportation.

Finally, research shows it helps if companies engage trusted messengers including doctors, colleagues and family to share information on the vaccine.

In other words, vaccine mandates are unlikely to result in a wave of resignations – but they are likely to lead to a boost in vaccination rates.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Follow all of the Expert Voices issues and debates — and become part of the discussion — on Facebook and Twitter. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher. This version of the article was originally published on Live Science.

Note: This article have been indexed to our site. We do not claim legitimacy, ownership or copyright of any of the content above. To see the article at original source Click Here

Related Posts
ANA、12月の国内線搭乗率57.6% 国際線34.6% thumbnail

ANA、12月の国内線搭乗率57.6% 国際線34.6%

 ANAホールディングス(9202)傘下の全日本空輸(ANA/NH)が2月4日に発表した2021年12月の利用実績によると、国際線は旅客数が前年同月比95.2%増の9万9222人、座席供給量を示すASK(有効座席キロ)は15.9%増の19億7377万6000座席キロ、有償旅客を運んだ距離を示すRPK(有償旅客キロ)は2.00倍の6億8303万4000旅客キロ、ロードファクター(座席利用率、L/F)は14.6ポイント上昇し34.6%だった。 21年12月の利用率が国内線57.6%、国際線34.6%だったANA=PHOTO: Tadayuki YOSHIKAWA/Aviation Wire  一方、国内線は旅客数が前年同月比53.3%増の199万3254人、ASKは4.0%増の31億4518万6000座席キロ、RPKは48.8%増の18億1095万4000旅客キロ、搭乗率は17.4ポイント上昇し57.6%となった。 ―記事の概要― ・国際線 ・国内線 ・貨物郵便 ・運航状況 国際線  国際線の方面別では、L/Fが最も高かったのは これより先は会員の方のみご覧いただけます。 無料会員は、有料記事を月あたり3記事まで無料でご覧いただけます。有料会員は、すべての有料記事をご覧いただけます。 会員の方はログインしてご覧ください。ご登録のない方は、無料会員登録すると続きをお読みいただけます。 無料会員として登録後、有料会員登録も希望する方は、会員用ページよりログイン後、有料会員登録をお願い致します。 * 会員には、無料個人会員および有料個人会員、有料法人会員の3種類ございます。  これらの会員になるには、最初に無料会員としての登録が必要です。 購読料はこちらをご覧ください。 * 有料会員と無料会員、非会員の違いは下記の通りです。・有料会員:会員限定記事を含む全記事を閲覧可能・無料会員:会員限定記事は月3本まで閲覧可能・非会員:会員限定記事以外を閲覧可能 * 法人会員登録は、こちらからお問い合わせください。* 法人の会員登録は有料のみです。
Read More
Cette lentille de contact affiche des notifications sur votre œil thumbnail

Cette lentille de contact affiche des notifications sur votre œil

InWith annonce les premières lentilles de contact souples capables d'afficher des informations directement sur l'œil. Elles peuvent également corriger la vue.Cela vous intéressera aussi [EN VIDÉO] Kezako : peut-on vraiment faire confiance à nos yeux ?  L’œil humain peut différencier près de huit millions de nuances de couleurs. Pourtant, cet organe si avancé ne donne…
Read More
Is Typhoon Rai in the Philippines a foretaste of the future? thumbnail

Is Typhoon Rai in the Philippines a foretaste of the future?

Le super-typhon Rai a ravagé les Philippines entre le 14 et le 18 décembre dernier, avec des vents qui ont dépassé les 250 km/h et une submersion massive des côtes. Le réchauffement des eaux du Pacifique et l'élévation du niveau des mers pourraient conduire à des phénomènes cycloniques beaucoup plus intenses, à l'image de Rai, d'ici 2050.Cela…
Read More
Index Of News