Lookback: Google launched the Panda algorithm update 11 years ago

It was 11 years ago today that Google announced an algorithm update that had a massive and far-reaching impact on SEO for years to come.

Here’s a complete history of the Google Panda algorithm update.

What was the Google Panda update?

Google Panda was a major algorithm update that impacted search rankings for 11.8% of queries in the U.S. Google said Panda was designed to reduce the rankings for low-quality sites (“sites which are low-value add for users, copy content from other websites or sites that are just not very useful”) and reward better rankings to high-quality sites (“sites with original content and information such as research, in-depth reports, thoughtful analysis and so on”).

The algorithm officially started rolling out on Feb. 23, but it wasn’t until Feb. 24 that we learned about it.

Panda didn’t only impact content farms. Websites of all sizes, across industries, felt the wrath of Panda. There were multiple reports of companies going out of business because they had relied on Google traffic for years. Once that traffic was gone, so was their business.

After its initial launch, Google announced several refreshes and updates to Panda on a near-monthly basis for the next two years (9 in 2011 and 14 in 2012). You will find a complete timeline and our coverage of those updates at the bottom of this guide.

Why was Google Panda launched?

In 2011, Google was trying to find a solution for its content farm problem. In case you’re not familiar with the term, a “content farm” was a website that paid freelance writers (typically poorly) to pump out as much content as fast as possible. The sole goal for these companies was to rank extremely well in Google’s search results for high-traffic keywords. Article quality was typically low.

Those high rankings meant these content farms got lots of traffic. And they monetized that traffic via display advertising (ironically, many of those sites were using Google AdSense.) Demand Media is probably the best example of the classic content farm model. Suite 101 was another big content farm.

Interestingly, many of the content issues Google was trying to solve in 2010 had come about after the Caffeine Update. Google was now crawling content faster, and its index grew rapidly. But it also meant some “shallow” content was ranking prominently. Business Insider even published an article with this rather blunt headline: Google’s Search Algorithm Has Been Ruined, Time To Move Back To Curation.” On TechCrunch, there was: “Why We Desperately Need a New (and Better) Google.”

Well, on Feb. 24, Google rocked the world of content farms – and the entire SEO industry.

Why did Google name it Panda?

In an interview with Wired, Amit Singhal revealed where the Panda name came from:

“Well, we named it internally after an engineer, and his name is Panda. So internally we called a big Panda. He was one of the key guys. He basically came up with the breakthrough a few months back that made it possible.”

Amit Singhal, Google’s head of search, in 2011

The full name of that Google engineer is Navneet Panda.

However, the update wasn’t referred to as “Panda” outside of Google when it initially launched. Search Engine Land founder Danny Sullivan called it the “Farmer’ update – until the Panda name was revealed in Wired. So if you see the Farmer name pop up in any of our old coverage of Panda, that’s why.]

What we know about the Google Panda algorithm

The most important thing you need to understand about Panda is that it evaluates the overall quality of the entire website.

Many myths and much speculation followed the arrival of Google Panda. Most of that is now irrelevant so we won’t rehash all of it in this guide.

Here’s a rundown of what we learned about how Google Panda worked.

Remove or improve low-quality content

On March 8, Michael Wyszomierski, a member of the Google webspam team, posted a message in a Webmaster Central help forum thread:

Our recent update is designed to reduce rankings for low-quality sites, so the key thing for webmasters to do is make sure their sites are the highest quality possible. We looked at a variety of signals to detect low quality sites. Bear in mind that people searching on Google typically don’t want to see shallow or poorly written content, content that’s copied from other websites, or information that are just not that useful. In addition, it’s important for webmasters to know that low quality content on part of a site can impact a site’s ranking as a whole. For this reason, if you believe you’ve been impacted by this change you should evaluate all the content on your site and do your best to improve the overall quality of the pages on your domain. Removing low quality pages or moving them to a different domain could help your rankings for the higher quality content.

– Michael Wyszomierski

What’s important to note here about Panda:

  • It can identify content that is shallow, poorly written, or copied from other websites.
  • Poorly written content can hurt rankings.
  • Removing low-quality pages from part of a website can help high-quality pages rank better.
  • Improving content (making it “useful”) can help your rankings.

Later on, Google tried to walk this back a bit, recommending adding high-quality content and fix the low-quality content, rather than removing content. This is most likely because many people started taking a metaphorical blowtorch to their content when a scalpel was needed.

Google on how to evaluate whether a site is ‘high-quality’

On May 6, 2011, Google published a list of 23 questions to explain how Google searches for high-quality sites, to help those that Panda had been negatively impacted:

  • Would you trust the information presented in this article?
  • Is this article written by an expert or enthusiast who knows the topic well, or is it more shallow in nature?
  • Does the site have duplicate, overlapping, or redundant articles on the same or similar topics with slightly different keyword variations?
  • Would you be comfortable giving your credit card information to this site?
  • Does this article have spelling, stylistic, or factual errors?
  • Are the topics driven by genuine interests of readers of the site, or does the site generate content by attempting to guess what might rank well in search engines?
  • Does the article provide original content or information, original reporting, original research, or original analysis?
  • Does the page provide substantial value when compared to other pages in search results?
  • How much quality control is done on content?
  • Does the article describe both sides of a story?
  • Is the site a recognized authority on its topic?
  • Is the content mass-produced by or outsourced to a large number of creators, or spread across a large network of sites, so that individual pages or sites don’t get as much attention or care?
  • Was the article edited well, or does it appear sloppy or hastily produced?
  • For a health related query, would you trust information from this site?
  • Would you recognize this site as an authoritative source when mentioned by name?
  • Does this article provide a complete or comprehensive description of the topic?
  • Does this article contain insightful analysis or interesting information that is beyond obvious?
  • Is this the sort of page you’d want to bookmark, share with a friend, or recommend?
  • Does this article have an excessive amount of ads that distract from or interfere with the main content?
  • Would you expect to see this article in a printed magazine, encyclopedia or book?
  • Are the articles short, unsubstantial, or otherwise lacking in helpful specifics?
  • Are the pages produced with great care and attention to detail vs. less attention to detail?
  • Would users complain when they see pages from this site?

Panda is part of Google’s core algorithm

On Jan. 12, 2016, we reported that Panda had become part of Google’s core algorithm. Google never confirmed an exact date when this changed. All we know with 100% certainty is that it happened at some point after Google’s last confirmed Panda update (4.2, July 17, 2015).

So even though it’s been years since Google announced an update, Panda lives on. It is part of the core algorithm, which means it is still impacting SEO, more than a decade after its launch.

The lasting impact of Google Panda today

Google Panda had an impact on SEO that lasts to this day. Here are just three big changes that came from Panda:

  • E-A-T. The concept of Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness (E-A-T, as found in the quality rater guidelines) can be traced back to the content farm problem. Google always wants to reward websites that publish high-quality content by experts who are authorities on a subject. The quality rater guidelines are the ultimate guide for how not to be a content farm.
  • Content marketing. Content marketing, as a term, wasn’t really a thing before Panda. Just go to Google Trends and you’ll see when the term started gaining popularity, and not by coincidence. The term itself may date back to 1996 (and the concept itself is as old as marketing), but content marketing as its own thing was essentially born as a result of Panda.
  • Differentiate or die. Perhaps the biggest lessons coming out of Google Panda was to never put all your eggs in one basket. Especially not Google’s. Relying on any one channel for all, or nearly all, of your traffic and income is not a business plan. It is a gamble. Never leave yourself at the mercy of any one channel. or platform – because you have no control over a third-party. If one algorithm change can wipe our your entire company overnight, you’re doing it wrong.

A complete Google Panda timeline

Below is the complete list of all 28 confirmed Panda updates and refreshes. Oh, and since we didn’t discuss that yet, an update meant Google somehow changed the Panda algorithm, while a refresh meant Google reapplied all the same signals from the most recent update.

Here’s Search Engine Land’s coverage of Panda, from 2011 to 2016:

Feb. 23, 2011: Panda Update 1.0

April 11, 2011: Google Panda Update 2.0

May 9, 2011: Panda Update 2.1

June 21, 2011: Panda Update 2.2

July 23, 2011: Panda Update 2.3

Aug. 12, 2011: Panda Update 2.4

Sept. 28, 2011: Panda Update 2.5

Oct. 19, 2011: Panda Update 3.0

Nov. 18, 2011: Panda Update 3.1

Jan. 18, 2012: Panda Update 3.2

Feb. 27, 2012: Panda Update 3.3

March 23, 2012: Panda Update 3.4

April 19, 2012: Panda Update 3.5

April 27, 2012: Panda Update 3.6

June 8, 2012: Panda Update 3.7

June 25, 2012: Panda Update 3.8

July 24, 2012: Panda Update 3.9

Aug. 20, 2012: Panda Update 3.9.1

Sept. 18, 2012: Panda Update 3.9.2

Sept. 27, 2012: Panda Update #20

Nov. 5, 2012: Panda Update #21

Nov. 21, 2012: Panda Update #22

Dec. 21, 2012: Panda Update #23

Jan. 22, 2013: Panda Update #24

March 14, 2013: Panda Update #25

May 20, 2014: Panda Update 4.0

Sept. 23, 2014: Panda Update 4.1

July 17, 2015: Panda Update 4.2


New on Search Engine Land

    About The Author

    Danny Goodwin is Senior Editor of Search Engine Land. In addition to writing daily about SEO, PPC, and more for Search Engine Land, Goodwin also manages Search Engine Land’s roster of subject-matter experts. He also helps program our conference series, SMX – Search Marketing Expo.

    Prior to joining Search Engine Land, Goodwin was Executive Editor at Search Engine Journal, where he led editorial initiatives for the brand. He also was an editor at Search Engine Watch. He has spoken at many major search conferences and virtual events, and has been sourced for his expertise by a wide range of publications and podcasts.

    Note: This article have been indexed to our site. We do not claim legitimacy, ownership or copyright of any of the content above. To see the article at original source Click Here

    Related Posts
    Windows 11 is going to have it quite complicated in companies because of the demanding requirements thumbnail

    Windows 11 is going to have it quite complicated in companies because of the demanding requirements

    Los exigentes requisitos de hardware de Windows 11 podrían perjudicar su despliegue en el ámbito empresarial. Según una investigación de Lansweeper, más de la mitad de las estaciones de trabajo encuestadas no están en condiciones inmediatas de ejecutar el sistema operativo de nueva generación de Microsoft. El estudio, que incluyó unos 30 millones de dispositivos…
    Read More
    はづ別館、なぜ「客が値決めするシステム」は終了したのか…30年間で得た知見 thumbnail

    はづ別館、なぜ「客が値決めするシステム」は終了したのか…30年間で得た知見

    「はづ別館HP」より 現在、広まりつつある、Pay as you wish(Pay as you like/あなたのお好きな価格を支払ってください)という決済システムの、日本における元祖的存在である「はづ別館」。その「はづ別館」を運営する株式会社はづ・代表取締役会長・加藤浩章氏へのインタビューに基づく、連載記事の第3回目である。 ・第1回 『客が値段を決める宿・はづ別館、経営の秘密…客・旅館側、双方の納得感が向上』 ・第2回 『はづ別館、客が値段を決めるシステム導入の驚異的影響…年間120本の取材依頼』  はづ別館の適正価格がいくらなのかは、難しい問題である。しかし、安定した経営を継続していくには、1泊2食付で1万~1万5000円程度以上は必要になると思われる。では、実際に宿泊客が付けた価格はいくらであったのか。  客が値付けするシステムの詳細は、まずチェックイン時に「泊まって、感じたままの価値観で……朝、お書き入れ下さいませ」と書かれた用紙が客に渡される。その用紙に客が価格を書くわけである。また、「感じたままの感想をぜひどうぞ。(お気づきの点、何なりとご記入ください)」という欄もある。裏面には氏名・住所・年齢・職業を記入するようになっている。  ここに記載されている実際の価格を見ると、100円から15万円と幅は極めて大きいものの、平均すると1万円は大きく超えている。ちなみに、15万円など高額な料金を付けた客に対しては、あらかじめ決めている上限の金額を受け取り、超えている部分は受け取らないというルールになっていた。  また、関東・中部・関西など、客の居住地域による価格差という特徴も確認できる。たとえば、関東からの客は全般的に価格が高く、関西からの客は値付けの幅が大きい。加えて、年齢・性別・職業などによる傾向の違いも確認できる。  加藤氏は、このシステムを採用してから30年を経て、人と地域性いうものが本当によくわかるようになったと語っている。  ちなみに、「大変満足だった」と記入しながらも5000円程度の価格を設定する客や、極めて稀ではあるが、冷やかしのような価格を設定する客のリピート利用、低額の常連客の利用に関しては、予約受付の際、はづ別館側から適正と思われる額を提示することもあったという。
    Read More
    The big question of the Supreme Court: The conditions are unclear in the agreement made by the builder, why should the Center not prepare an ideal builder-buyer agreement;  Answer sought in four weeks thumbnail

    The big question of the Supreme Court: The conditions are unclear in the agreement made by the builder, why should the Center not prepare an ideal builder-buyer agreement; Answer sought in four weeks

    Hindi NewsLocalDelhi ncrThe Terms And Conditions Are Vague In The Agreements Drawn Up By The Builder, So Why Shouldn't The Center Prepare A Model Builder buyer Agreement; Answer Sought In Four Weeksनई दिल्लीएक घंटा पहलेकॉपी लिंकजस्टिस चंद्रचूड़ ने कहा- यह महत्वपूर्ण विषय है, ऐसा आदर्श एग्रीमेंट खरीदारों को शोषण से बचाने में मददगार हो सकता…
    Read More
    雪かきで地域貢献…センバツ『21世紀枠』待つ福井・丹生高校「町の活性化にもなる」【高校野球】:中日スポーツ・東京中日スポーツ thumbnail

    雪かきで地域貢献…センバツ『21世紀枠』待つ福井・丹生高校「町の活性化にもなる」【高校野球】:中日スポーツ・東京中日スポーツ

    学校内の雪かきをする丹生の硬式野球部員たち  第94回センバツ高校野球大会(3月18日から13日間・甲子園)の出場32校を決める選考委員会が28日、オンライン形式で開かれる。一般選考は明治神宮大会枠を含めて29校。21世紀枠は困難な条件の克服や地域への貢献、文武両道など戦力以外の特色を加味し、最終候補9校から3校を選出する。北信越地区から21世紀枠の最終候補に挙がる丹生(福井)は、選出されれば春夏通じて初の甲子園となる。  人口2万人の町にある高校が吉報を心待ちにしている。丹生主将の来田竹竜内野手(2年)は「ずっと甲子園に出たいと思っていたけど、出られるチャンスが本当に来るなんて…。緊張してます」と笑顔をみせる。  部員全員が県内出身で地元の越前町や近隣の鯖江市がほとんどだ。大雪に見舞われた時には部員が自主的に地域の雪かきに協力。高齢化が進む雪国で地域への貢献も評価されての最終候補入りし、自身も越前町出身の来田は「自分が生まれ育った地域でセンバツに出られれば町の活性化にもなる」と力を込める。  冬は武道場でのユニークな練習が中心だ。練習前には畳の上で全員があおむけに寝そべって足の指を動かす。その後は高さ60センチのブロックにジャンプで乗り降りしたり、ボクシングのミットとグローブでパンチを打ったりする練習が続く。  春木竜一監督(49)は「体の使い方がうまければ強いパンチが打てる。自分の体の使い方がうまくないと、野球もうまくなれない」と独特な練習の理由を説明する。工夫を凝らした練習で2019年夏には玉村昇悟投手(現広島)を擁して福井大会準優勝。昨秋の県大会では4強入りするなど実力も付けてきた。  「もう選ばれる努力はできないけど、選ばれるチャンスはあると選手に伝えてます」と春木監督。人事は尽くした。あとは天命を待つばかりだ。 購読試読のご案内 プロ野球はもとより、メジャーリーグ、サッカー、格闘技のほかF1をはじめとするモータースポーツ情報がとくに充実。芸能情報や社会面ニュースにも定評あり。
    Read More
    Gen Z more likely to respond to physical, direct marketing campaigns thumbnail

    Gen Z more likely to respond to physical, direct marketing campaigns

    Gen Z is more likely to engage with direct mail marketing campaigns, research by World Advertising Research Centre (Warc) and Royal Mail Marketreach has found.The report, named Driving Effectiveness with Direct Mail, is based on 218 UK campaigns, published between 2016 and 2020 on Warc's database, which used direct mail as the lead media or…
    Read More
    Index Of News
    Total
    0
    Share