Prime Number Puzzle Has Stumped Mathematicians for More Than a Century

While I was looking for a gift for a child’s birthday, a math book fell into my hands. I am always fascinated when authors write about abstract scientific topics for children, whether it’s on Albert Einstein’s theories, the life of Marie Curie, technology or space travel. But this particular book was different. It’s all about prime numbers—specifically twin primes. Danish author Jan Egesborg has endeavored to introduce children to one of the most stubborn open problems in number theory, which even the brightest minds have repeatedly failed to solve over the past 100-plus years: the twin prime conjecture.

As is so often the case in mathematics, the conjecture falls into the category of those that are easy to understand but devilishly hard to prove. Twin primes are two prime numbers that have a distance of two on the number line; that is, they are directly consecutive if you ignore even numbers. Examples include 3 and 5, 5 and 7, and 17 and 19. You can find a lot of twin primes among small numbers, but the farther up the number line you go, the rarer they become.

That’s no surprise, given that prime numbers are increasingly rare among large numbers. Nevertheless, people have known since ancient times that infinitely many prime numbers exist, and the prime number twin conjecture states that there are an infinite number of prime number twins, as well. That would mean that no matter how large the values considered, there will always be prime numbers in direct succession among the odd numbers.


On supporting science journalism

If you’re enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Admittedly, translating these concepts for kids is not easy (which is why I have so much respect for Egesborg and his children’s book). Prime numbers (2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13,…) are like the fundamental particles of the natural numbers. They are only divisible by 1 and themselves. All other natural numbers can be broken down into their prime divisors, which makes prime numbers the basic building blocks of the mathematical world.

A Proof from Antiquity

Mathematics has an unlimited number of prime number building blocks. Euclid proved this more than 2,000 years ago with a simple thought experiment. Suppose there were only a finite number of prime numbers, the largest being p. In this case, all prime numbers up to p could be multiplied together.

In this case, you could multiply all prime numbers up to p with each other and add 1: 2 x 3 x 5 x 7 x 11 x … x p + 1. The result cannot be divided by any of the existing prime numbers. This means that the number 2 x 3 x 5 x 7 x 11 x … x p + 1 is either prime or has a prime factor that does not appear in the original 2, 3,…, p primes. Therefore, no finite list of primes can ever be complete; it will always be possible to construct additional ones. It follows that there are infinitely many prime numbers.

Not all mysteries about prime numbers have been solved, however. Their distribution on the number line, in particular, remains a mystery. Although we know that prime numbers appear less and less frequently among large numbers, it is not possible to specify exactly how they are distributed.

In principle, the average distance between one prime number and the next is the value ln(p). For the small number p =19, this corresponds to ln(19) ≈ 3. For the large prime number 2,147,483,647, the distance is around 22. For the huge value 531,137,992,816,767,098,689,588,206,552,468,627,329,593,117,727,031,923,199,444,138,200,403,559,860,852,242,739,162,502,265,229,285,668,889,329,486,246,501,015,346,579,337,652,707,239,409,519,978,766,587,351,943,831,270,835,393,219,031,728,127 (also a prime number), the distance is around 420.

As these examples illustrate, the average distance between the prime numbers increases with the size of p. And this fact makes prime number twins, which have the smallest possible distance between them (apart from 2 and 3), so interesting to number theorists. As the average distance between prime numbers increases, it could be that at a certain point there are no more twins. Yet most experts think otherwise. Why, they reason, should there be a certain point on the number line from which no more twin primes suddenly appear? What makes this one point so special? Number theorists assume that even if these prime number twins become rarer, you will always eventually come across another pair.

Computer calculations to date seem to support this view. The largest pair of prime number twins found so far is: 2,996,863,034,895 x 21,290,000 + 1 and 2,996,863,034,895 x 21,290,000 – 1, both numbers with 388,342 digits. A computer-aided search will never be able to prove that there are an infinite number of twin primes, however. Stronger tactics are needed.

An Unexpected Surprise

A little-known mathematician delivered just that in 2013. Yitang Zhang had previously been a household name among very few specialists—but then he published a paper that hit the number theory world like a bomb. He was not able to prove the prime number twin conjecture but demonstrated something close to it, which was more progress than anyone had made since the twin prime conjecture was formulated in the 19th century.

Zhang showed that there are an infinite number of pairs of prime numbers of the type (p, p + N) with a distance N between them that is less than 70 million. The twin prime conjecture would have been proved if he had been able to prove his result for N=2. Instead Zhang demonstrated that among all pairs of prime numbers with a distance of less than 70 million, there is at least one pairing (p, p + N) that occurs infinitely often.

This proof was a huge step forward because mathematicians are not only interested in prime number twins but also in other types of prime number pairs, such as those with a distance of four (such as 3 and 7 or 19 and 23), the so-called cousin primes, or those with a distance of six (such as 5 and 11 or 11 and 17), the so-called sexy primes. In general, it is unclear whether an infinite number of any of these pairings exist.

Zhang achieved this astonishing result using what mathematicians call prime number sieves. These constructs can be imagined as a real sieve: you tip all the natural numbers into it and filter out all the values that are not prime numbers. This idea is named for the ancient Greek scholar and mathematician Eratosthenes, though the first known written record of it is from a few centuries after he lived. It involves a list of natural numbers in which one removes every even value (apart from 2), then all multiples of 3, multiples of 5, and so on, such that only the prime numbers remain at the end.

Graphic uses a grid of natural numbers from 2 to 120 to show how filtering out all multiples of the first few prime numbers (2, 3, 5 and 7) leaves only prime numbers remaining.

By going through all the natural numbers one by one and eliminating their multiples (except for the number itself), only prime numbers will remain.

Amanda Montañez

Although the sieve of Eratosthenes is exact, it is very difficult to apply to concrete problems from a mathematical point of view. Using this method to prove general statements about prime numbers seems hopeless in most cases. Zhang therefore turned to another sieve that only sifts out numbers with large prime divisors. Although this sieve is not as effective as others, it allows enough flexibility to carry out extensive proofs. Zhang worked single-handedly on the twin prime conjecture for years—number theory was not actually part of his research area.

This persistence paid off: Zhang proved that there is at least one kind of prime number pair with a distance of less than 70 million that occurs infinitely often. And the next breakthrough was not long in coming.

Number theorists from all over the world pounced on Zhang’s result and tried to improve it. A joint project was set up, and numerous experts joined in. By optimizing Zhang’s method, they were able to reduce the maximum distance N between the pairs of prime numbers to get as close as possible to 2. Within a few months, they showed that there is at least one type of prime number pair with a maximum distance of 4,680 that occurs infinitely often. Around the same time, two Fields Medalists, Terence Tao and James Maynard, independently developed a modified sieve that enabled them to reduce the result to 246, an unbroken record to date.

In concrete terms, this means that if you look at all pairs of prime numbers (p, p + N) that have a distance between N=2 and N=246, then there is at least one such pair that occurs infinitely often. The sieving methods cannot be generalized so far as to push the result down to N=2, however.

Still, the results mark unexpected progress in an area that leaves many experts baffled. Maynard makes this clear in a Numberphile YouTube video: “This is one of the interesting and frustrating things about prime numbers: that often it’s clear what the right answer should be…. The game is always trying to rule out there being some very bizarre conspiracy among prime numbers that would mean that they would behave in a rather different way to how we believe that they should behave.”

Of course, Egesborg could not include all these details in his children’s book on the subject. Nevertheless, he managed to write a book that conveys a few mathematical concepts in a playful way.

I bought the book and gave it to the child in question on his birthday—and. his parents later told me that he had thoroughly enjoyed it. As I found out afterward, however, this was less a result of the mathematical content than the fact that a frog farts loudly on one of the first pages.

This article originally appeared in Spektrum der Wissenschaft and was reproduced with permission.

Note: This article have been indexed to our site. We do not claim legitimacy, ownership or copyright of any of the content above. To see the article at original source Click Here

Related Posts
Google’s AI isn’t too woke. It’s too rushed thumbnail

Google’s AI isn’t too woke. It’s too rushed

OpinionBy Parmy OlsonFebruary 29, 2024 — 3.20pmDid you hear? Google has been accused of having a secret vendetta against white people. Elon Musk exchanged tweets about the conspiracy on X more than 150 times over the past week, all regarding portraits generated with Google’s new AI chatbot Gemini.Ben Shapiro, The New York Post and Musk
Read More
Existence of Earth Trojan Asteroid Confirmed – Could Become “Ideal Bases” for Advanced Exploration of the Solar System thumbnail

Existence of Earth Trojan Asteroid Confirmed – Could Become “Ideal Bases” for Advanced Exploration of the Solar System

Using the 4.1-meter SOAR (Southern Astrophysical Research) Telescope on Cerro Pachón in Chile, astronomers have confirmed that an asteroid discovered in 2020 by the Pan-STARRS1 survey, called 2020 XL5, is an Earth Trojan (an Earth companion following the same path around the Sun as Earth does) and revealed that it is much larger than the…
Read More
Call of Duty: Vanguard takes the shine off Pokémon (USA) thumbnail

Call of Duty: Vanguard takes the shine off Pokémon (USA)

O ano passado foi ótimo para as fabricantes de consoles e para as grandes editoras de games em mercados aquecidos como os Estados Unidos: além do estabelecimento da 9ª geração de consoles, algumas novas sequências de franquias já consagradas conseguiram arrecadar pouco melhor que em 2020. É o caso do Call of Duty: Vanguard. Call…
Read More
ハワイアン航空、成田と関空3月まで便数継続 thumbnail

ハワイアン航空、成田と関空3月まで便数継続

 ハワイアン航空(HAL/HA)は1月17日、日本路線の3月の運航計画を発表した。冬ダイヤ最終日の現地発26日までが対象で、これまでと同じくホノルル-成田線を週3往復、ホノルル-関西線を週1往復運航し、羽田などその他の路線は運休する。翌27日から始まる夏ダイヤのスケジュールは未定で、新型コロナの変異ウイルス「オミクロン株」の状況や入国後の隔離状況などにより決定する。 成田と関空の便数を3月まで継続するハワイアン航空=PHOTO: Tadayuki YOSHIKAWA/Aviation Wire  成田線の運航日はホノルル発が火曜と木曜、日曜、成田発が火曜と木曜、土曜。成田行きHA821便がホノルルを午前11時に出発して、翌日午後4時に着く。ホノルル行きHA822便は午後7時55分に成田を出発し、午前7時40分に到着する。15日から26日まではホノルル発着の時間を変更し、HA821便が午前11時15分発、HA822便が午前7時55分着となる。成田発着の時間は変更しない。HA821便は27日も運航する。  関西線はホノルル発が火曜、関西空港発が木曜。関西行きHA449便が午後1時10分にホノルルを出発して、翌日午後6時45分に着く。ホノルル行きHA450便は午後8時45分に関空を出発し、午前8時45分に到着する。17日以降のホノルル行きのみ着時間を変更し、午前9時5分に到着する。  運休中のホノルル-羽田、札幌(新千歳)、福岡の各線、コナ-羽田線は運休を継続する。 3月の運航スケジュール ホノルル-成田 HA821 ホノルル(11:00)→成田(翌日16:00)運航日:3/10までの火木日 HA821 ホノルル(11:15)→成田(翌日16:00)運航日:3/15からの火木日 HA821 ホノルル(11:45)→成田(翌日16:00)運航日:3/27 HA822 成田(19:55)→ホノルル(07:40)運航日:3/12までの火木土 HA822 成田(19:55)→ホノルル(07:55)運航日:3/15からの火木土 ホノルル-関西 HA449 ホノルル(13:10)→関西(翌日18:45)運航日:火 HA450 関西(20:45)→ホノルル(08:45)運航日:3/10までの木 HA450 関西(20:45)→ホノルル(09:05)運航日:3/17からの木 関連リンクHawaiian Airlinesハワイアン航空 ・ハワイアン航空、成田と関空2月まで便数継続(21年12月13日) ・ハワイアン航空、マウイ島の地ビールでハワイ気分 アンケートで航空券(21年6月8日) ・ハワイアン航空、現地自己隔離免除のPCR検査予約代行(21年6月4日) ・ハワイアン航空、オハナ・バイ・ハワイアン終了 ATR機は売却(21年5月29日)
Read More
Making 'Moonfall': Geophysicist Mika McKinnon talks about the fun of annihilating Earth in the fictional disaster film (video) thumbnail

Making ‘Moonfall’: Geophysicist Mika McKinnon talks about the fun of annihilating Earth in the fictional disaster film (video)

Home News Entertainment In "Moonfall," the latest movie from the so-called "master of disaster" Roland Emmerich, Earth faces an extinction-level event caused by an alien that's been living on the moon. Despite being plentiful in planetary destruction overflowing with explosions and incorporating an abundant amount of action, you might be surprised at how much care and…
Read More
Apple kills off troubled FineWoven line, report claims thumbnail

Apple kills off troubled FineWoven line, report claims

Image: Eugen Wegmann Apple’s much-maligned range of FineWoven accessories, made of an imitation-leather material for environmental reasons, has now been completely killed off, according to a new report. The same source indicates that the company intends to replace FineWoven with another leather-replacement material, but hopefully one which suffers from fewer problems. Twitter/X user Kosutami, a
Read More
Index Of News
Total
0
Share