The lesson from tonight’s astonishing results: campaigns matter


POLITICAL scientists are often sniffy about campaigns. They think that campaigns have at best a minimal impact on election results and sometimes have none whatsoever. Alan Abramowitz, an American political scientist, expressed his discipline’s received wisdom with reference to his country’s elections in an article in the Washington Post:

When you’re in the middle of a campaign there’s a tendency for people, especially in the media, to overestimate the importance of certain events. These include high-profile gaffes, vice-presidential selections, controversial ads and other moments that capture so much attention…Those things have no measurable impact. The media are interested in getting people’s attention, but a lot of stories you read or see are focusing on things that are trivial. The way campaigns play out is largely determined by fundamentals.

We can now pronounce with absolute confidence, on the basis of Britain’s general election, that political scientists are talking tosh. Election campaigns matter an enormous amount. When Theresa May called this election on 18th April the Conservatives were 20 points ahead of Labour. In local elections on May 4th the Tories beat Labour by an average of ten points and advanced deep into Labour territory by winning the mayorship of the West Midlands. Then came the campaign.

Theresa May ran what was perhaps the worst campaign in recent political history—robotic, cliché-ridden, condescending, slapdash and otherwise awful. By contrast Labour’s Jeremy Corbyn ran an inspired campaign. He started off with the huge advantage that expectations were so low; if he didn’t devour a baby on the screen people were pleasantly surprised. But as the election proceeded he turned into an impressive campaigner. He dealt with hostile interviewers with a zen-like calm. He explained his beliefs patiently. Mrs May’s rallies were abysmal affairs. She frequently imported party apparatchiks to pretend to be real people. Mr Corbyn’s rallies by contrast were thrilling—huge crowds of the party faithful flocked to see their leader.

Mrs May’s team made four unforgiveable mistakes. First, they allowed expectations to get out of control. Shortly after Mrs May declared the election Tory journalists debated whether the Tories would have a majority of 100 or 150 or even more. This hubris extended to Mrs May’s inner-team. Nick Timothy, Mrs May’s co-chief of staff, crafted an election strategy based on winning votes in the Labour heartland.

Second, they made the entire election about Theresa May. The aim was to turn the election into a referendum between two people and their ability to negotiate Brexit: “strong and stable” Mrs May and wild and woolly Mr Corbyn. Mrs May’s campaign team all but abolished the Tory party. Posters referred to “Theresa’s team” and cabinet members were sidelined (indeed Philip Hammond, the chancellor, disappeared entirely). But having made the entire election about herself Mrs May failed to deliver. She performed dismally when pressed by clever interviewers such as Andrew Neil. She refused to turn up for a leader’s debate.

Third, they turned on their most faithful supporters. The disintegration of the campaign can be dated from the publication of the manifesto and the discovery of a “dementia tax” in the section on care for the elderly. Mrs May included a suggestion that older people with expensive houses should pay more for their care at home. This might be regarded as admirably brave. But she failed to put a cap on the amount of money they would be expected to pay. This meant that people who were unlucky enough to suffer from dementia might face gigantic bills. And then she retreated from her suggestion while loudly proclaiming that she was advancing. When it turned out that Mr Timothy had inserted the dementia tax into the manifesto at the last moment without consulting anyone, even loyal Tories began to worry about her leadership style.

Fourth, they treated voters with contempt. There were robotic slogans, “strong and stable” being the worst offender. There were cardboard photo-ops. There were tedious speeches. Sir Lynton Crosby, Mrs May’s campaign manager, has long believed in endless repetition and hyper-control—if you keep repeating the same slogan over and over again the electors may have just about registered it by the time they go to the polls. That style of politics died on June 8th and Sir Lynton’s career as the Tory’s go-to advisor died with it.

Mrs May called the election in order to “guarantee certainty and security for years to come”. By running such an astonishingly dismal campaign she has guaranteed the opposite if not for years then at least for months to come.

Note: This article have been indexed to our site. We do not claim legitimacy, ownership or copyright of any of the content above. To see the article at original source Click Here

Related Posts
Rosja: Na ćwiczeniach z udziałem Putina odpalono pociski Cyrkon, Iskander i Siniewa (aktualizacja) thumbnail

Rosja: Na ćwiczeniach z udziałem Putina odpalono pociski Cyrkon, Iskander i Siniewa (aktualizacja)

Drogi Użytkowniku! W związku z odwiedzaniem naszych serwisów internetowych możemy przetwarzać Twój adres IP, pliki cookies i podobne dane nt. aktywności lub urządzeń użytkownika. Jeżeli dane te pozwalają zidentyfikować Twoją tożsamość, wówczas będą traktowane dodatkowo jako dane osobowe zgodnie z Rozporządzeniem Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady 2016/679 (RODO). Administratora tych danych, cele i podstawy przetwarzania oraz…
Read More
The wild emotional year changed the investment thumbnail

The wild emotional year changed the investment

Pisanje v forum je na voljo samo naročnikom Financ. Več iz teme. Obveščaj me o novih člankih:   Čas branja: 6 min 12.01.2022  17:30 Foto: Ilustracija: Jinhwa Jang/Bloomberg Businessweek Celotni članek je na voljo le naročnikom. 3 MESECI FINANC ŽE ZA 14,99 EUR ✔ Naročnina brez vezave – odpoved kadarkoli ✔ Aplikacija Finance na iOS…
Read More
Banco de la República ve condiciones menos favorables para 2022 thumbnail

Banco de la República ve condiciones menos favorables para 2022

Leonardo Villar (der.), gerente general del Banrep, y José Manuel Restrepo, ministro de Hacienda.Banco de la República POR: febrero 01 de 2022 - 10:19 p. m. 2022-02-01 2022-02-01 Aunque durante este año algunos indicadores económicos registrarán mejoría, como el déficit de la cuenta corriente que bajaría al 4,9% del PIB, otros estarán a merced de la…
Read More
Which one to buy Pallet jack or Electric pallet jack? thumbnail

Which one to buy Pallet jack or Electric pallet jack?

A pallet jack is one of the most common materials handling tools used for material movement. Pallet Jack count as a material handling equipment. It works like a forklift to move material. There is a different kind of pallet jack available in the market like manual or hand pallet jack, electric pallet jack, scissor pallet
Read More
US jobless claims surprise thumbnail

US jobless claims surprise

YASAL UYARI: Piyasa verileri Foreks Bilgi İletişim Hizmetleri A.Ş. tarafından sağlanmaktadır. Üye girişi yapılan Canlı Borsa sayfaları haricinde Hisse senedi verileri 15 dk gecikmelidir. Tahvil-Bono-Repo özet verileri her durumda 15 dk gecikmelidir. Burada yer alan yatırım bilgi, yorum ve tavsiyeleri yatırım danışmanlığı kapsamında değildir. Yatırım danışmanlığı hizmeti; aracı kurumlar, portföy yönetim şirketleri, mevduat kabul etmeyen…
Read More
Index Of News