UNCERTAINTIES: Judges may take office if elections are postponed

The dispute is scheduled for October, but the lack of perspective of when the crisis will end worries politicians and magistrates

The possibility of postponing this year’s elections because of the Covid-19 pandemic in the country could lead judges to be in charge of the country’s municipalities. The dispute is scheduled for October, but the lack of perspective of when the crisis will end worries politicians and magistrates, who are already discussing scenarios in case the population cannot go to the polls this year. Among the alternatives being considered behind the scenes are postponing the elections until December, unifying them with the 2022 disputes or holding them early next year, but without extending the terms of current mayors and councilors, which could generate disputes from political opponents . In these last two scenarios, the succession line provides that the judge responsible for the city’s district assumes the local administration provisionally in case of absence of the mayor, vice and mayor. The president of the Chamber of Deputies, Rodrigo Maia (DEM/RJ), even mentioned the hypothesis during a lecture two weeks ago. But the demonstration was seen by allies only as a way to take a stand against the idea of ​​extending terms for mayors and councilors. In the legal field, the possibility is also viewed with reservations. That’s because districts face a shortage of magistrates and excessive processes. “I don’t see this scenario,” said the president of the Association of Magistrates of Brazil, Renata Gil de Alcantara Videira. Proposals to change the election date because of the new coronavirus have already been filed with the National Congress. The top of the Legislative, however, only intends to open some debate about it in mid-May or June. It is up to the Legislature to change the Constitution. Continues after publicity”We only have two options. The best is that everything is normal in October. The worst is that we have to learn to live within normality, discover how to practice the actions of the electoral calendar under these new conditions,” said Henrique Neves, jurist and former minister of the Superior Electoral Court (TSE), against the postponement. Even if lawmakers promote a constitutional amendment, it must be judicialized because the change would take place less than a year until voting Sunday. Therefore, it is possible that the Federal Supreme Court (STF) is asked to express its opinion. Meanwhile, current mayors are putting pressure on. Concerned about not being politically affected in the final stretch of terms of office, they want to postpone the elections – with the extension of their terms – and put in return the chance to allocate money from this year’s electoral fund for actions of containment. The R$ 2 billion foreseen in the Budget are reserved for candidates’ expenses such as travel, electoral cables and advertising.”The suspension, at this moment, seems adequate. For when? We will have to evaluate, but it seems to me that in October there is no way. By suspending it, we could use the money from the Electoral Fund to fight the pandemic,” said Glademir Aroldi, president of the Confederation National of Municipalities, entity that represents the mayors. Politicians deep in conversations about postponement argue that important stages of the electoral calendar compete with an acute phase of the disease, and necessary social assistance actions can be interpreted as electoral maneuvers. They mention, as an example, the party conventions, when the candidacies are made official, scheduled for July and early August.In addition, mayors complain that they will end their terms of office in a scenario of falling revenue, due to the impacts of the reduction in economic activities, and the increase in expenses, brought about by the measures necessary to contain the virus.”Mayors will have to take measures, especially in medium and small cities, where the epidemic is not yet at a very high level. They close businesses and there is strong pressure because of that. I feel sorry for the municipal managers, I have been praying for them”, affirmed Aroldi. Minister Luís Roberto Barroso, of the STF, spoke about the matter on April 3rd. About to take over the TSE, he defended the maintenance of the current calendar, but admitted a postponement until December at the most. The current president of the Court, Minister Rosa Weber, also rejects any change of date for the time being, but, just in case, created a working group formed by technicians from the ministry to assess, weekly, the impacts of the crisis on the electoral calendar. The first meeting of the collegiate is scheduled for this Tuesday, 14. The Electoral Law Commission of the Brazilian Bar Association (OAB) is against unifying the election dates. For the president of the collegiate, Eduardo Damian, the debate should be restricted to strategies to enable party conventions in virtual environments and to offer more security to voters, such as expanding voting times.”The deadlines that are in force today can, even if precariously, be met through remote work. If, by chance, the pandemic situation is not controlled in a month or two, we will discuss a reasonable solution”, he said.

Note: This article have been indexed to our site. We do not claim legitimacy, ownership or copyright of any of the content above. To see the article at original source Click Here

Related Posts
We need more black gay men in the public sector thumbnail

We need more black gay men in the public sector

Do gay men face employment discrimination in the public sector? There are many views but little to no data related to this question. Many gay men report experiencing discrimination in hiring and on the job, and the quality of job protections in the public sector is mixed. No previous study has examined whether gay men…
Read More
國民黨「兩岸牌」為何落漆?學者曝失語危機:眾聲喧嘩又先露底牌 thumbnail


國民黨於在野近6年來,由於本身黨主席更迭不斷,從洪秀柱、吳敦義、江啟臣、再到回鍋的朱立倫,除了國內選戰應戰不瑕以外,其兩岸論述也在這樣的更迭中難有明確而一致的說法。學者認為,即便朱立倫重掌黨機器,但整個藍營看不出有代表性的主流兩岸論述,有的學者甚至「比中共還早些攤牌」,反而讓國民黨在兩岸互動上愈來愈「失語」且缺乏影響力,當「沒有國民黨的兩岸關係」中,民進黨也不致於走不下去時,或許也是藍營危機所在。[啟動LINE推播] 每日重大新聞通知 台灣韜略策進學會秘書長吳建忠接受《風傳媒》採訪時表示,直到目前(1月24日)中共尚未公布每年的對台工作會議是否召開,若比較相對親藍、親綠的學者,前者已經有不少評論,但後者通常都是等到中共「出招」之後才會加以應對,「不主動發聲不代表不關注,而是從學界,或到政府的國安、調查局、軍情局都在私下研究」,但前者在中共發聲之前先加以「詮釋」,則有種「底牌先露」的情況,或甚至會被綠營譏為「幫中共恐嚇台灣」之嫌,畢竟具體文件與論述,對岸都還沒公布。 台灣韜略策進學會秘書長吳建忠接受《風傳媒》採訪,指出國民黨在兩岸互動上愈來愈「失語」且缺乏影響力。。(蔡親傑攝) 吳建忠舉例,像前國安會秘書長蘇起提出「中共將單方面處理台灣問題」,還指「兩岸談判已經沒有了」,但前國防部副部長林中斌則為文認為「台海終無戰,兩岸漸融冰」;連曾為國民黨前黨主席江啟臣提供兩岸論述改革建議的施威全,都指蘇起的論述反而讓民眾更加深對藍營的刻板印象,會認為在幫中共恐嚇台灣人民。 國民黨兩岸路線「眾聲喧嘩」:看不出是誰操盤 「目前到底藍營的兩岸論述誰在控盤,很難看得出來。」吳建忠也說,民眾不會去分誰是智庫學者、誰是接近黨中央的學者,誰是一般民間學者,只會統括視為「藍營」,那到底誰的說法代表藍營的主流看法?也很令人疑惑。 前國安會秘書長蘇起聲稱「中共將單方面處理台灣問題」,被另一藍營學者直指「幫中共恐嚇台灣人民」。(資料照,方炳超攝) 也有親綠的兩岸研究學者表示,目前藍營裡也沒有看到新一代的兩岸關係研究學者,若以前藍營會笑民進黨在立院有「三寶」,認為他們發言頻惹爭議,但現在立院裡,能提出具體、與時俱進兩岸論述的藍營立委也不多了。 同時,若以對岸的觀點來看,對於藍營的主流人物似乎也沒有聚焦對象。像對岸的公知司馬南,才因為中廣董事長趙少康呼籲對岸軍機在過年期間「別再來了」,引發司馬南為文批評,指1950年代台灣掌握制空權時,國民黨對中國大陸東海沿海地區的襲擾從未間斷,甚至還在上海造成大爆炸。上述學者稱,如果連趙少康這樣在藍營占有舉足輕重角色的人士,都不被對岸公知所認同,那藍營在兩岸關係上能發揮的空間可能愈來愈小。 風傳媒歡迎各界分享發聲,來稿請寄至 opinion@storm.mg
Read More
Index Of News