Your Smart Scale Probably Isn’t Accurate Enough to Be Useful

Image for article titled Your Smart Scale Probably Isn’t Accurate Enough to Be Useful

Photo: Koldunov Alexey (Shutterstock)

Your weight on the scale changes for so many reasons. We can gain or lose muscle, and we can gain or lose fat. We can be lighter when we’re dehydrated, or heavier because we ate a lot of salt last night and we’re retaining water. Wouldn’t it be great to tell the difference between all of these things? That’s what many smart scales promise.

How scales measure your body composition

Weight is simple enough: You step on the scale, and it measures the force with which gravity pulls down on your body.

The body fat, muscle mass, bone mass, body water, and other measures (which we can summarize as “body composition”) come from something called bioimpedance analysis, or BIA.

Conductive foot pads on your scale (which may be almost-invisibly layered into the material of the scale) pass a current through your body, from one foot to the other. You won’t feel this current, and it’s not dangerous, although if you have a pacemaker you may be told it’s best to turn this feature off.

G/O Media may get a commission

The scale can detect the electrical resistance between one foot and the other, which means the current is running up one leg, through your torso, and down the other leg. In essence, the formula imagines your legs and hips as a sort of horseshoe shape made of a mixture of water and not-water. It uses your height (which you enter into the app when you set up a profile) to guess at the length of this horseshoe shape. And based on the resistance it measures, it comes up with a guess about how much of your body is made of fatty tissues versus watery tissues.

As you might expect, there are many limitations to this approach. The biggest is just the number of guesses the formula has to make about your body to get from “this is a 5’6″ human with a foot-to-foot resistance value of X” to “your body is 32% fat,” much less estimating the amount of bone or dry muscle tissue.

For example, it makes assumptions about how much of your fat, muscle, and so on are in your upper body versus your lower body. It can also be thrown off by how hydrated you are, how recently you have exercised, and whether you have artificial knees or hips.

A review article on the accuracy of BIA points out that, because so many assumptions are required, even the best devices and algorithms are probably never going to be able to give totally accurate, detailed body composition information for an individual:

A fundamental problem is that BIA is a predictive method that inherently requires simplifications and assumptions based on population mean values yet considered as being accurately applicable to all subjects.

A Consumer Reports study from 2016 found that the scales they tested differed from a BodPod measurement of body fat by anywhere from 21% to 34%. That’s not really accurate enough to know for sure what your body fat percentage is. If you truly want a number, any number, a simple calculation like the Navy body fat estimator is probably going to be just as good.

Some people say they like to watch their body fat (or muscle mass) change over time, and that it goes in the direction they’d expect. Your experience may vary on this. My Withings smart scale has never showed any meaningful change in these numbers for me, even when I know my body composition has changed. (And yes, I’ve tried turning on “athlete” mode. Even though I have more muscle than the average person my size, the numbers get even less realistic for me with athlete mode.)

What about all the other numbers?

Smart scales are marketed largely by the number of features they have. A scale that can tell you 12 things looks fancier than one that can only tell you one or two metrics, right?

If you put your height into the app, and assuming the scale is accurate enough at determining your weight, measurements of your BMI should be correct, since BMI is just the relationship between your height and weight.

Some scales claim to measure your BMR (basal metabolic rate), but that’s usually calculated from your weight, height, and age. You can get that from an internet calculator.

Measures of muscle, fat, bone, and body water are usually just tweaks on the body fat formula calculated by BIA; for example, lean body mass is your total weight minus body fat. These measures all have the same accuracy issues as we discussed above about BIA. I wouldn’t put much stock in any of them.

Some scales measure heart rate, which you can check yourself; just count the beats of your pulse while watching a clock, and see if it matches the number from your scale.

Look carefully at the other numbers your scale claims to report, and you’ll probably see that they are calculated from data you put in your profile in the app, often in conjunction with your weight or other scale data.

So are these scales accurate enough to be useful? In my opinion, no. If you find that the readings are consistent enough to track over time, go ahead and have fun with them. But I wouldn’t use the numbers from a smart scale (except for weight) to make any decisions about what to eat or how to train.

Note: This article have been indexed to our site. We do not claim legitimacy, ownership or copyright of any of the content above. To see the article at original source Click Here

Related Posts
Scientists develop new method to create stable, efficient next-gen solar cells thumbnail

Scientists develop new method to create stable, efficient next-gen solar cells

Next-generation solar materials are cheaper and more sustainable to produce than traditional silicon solar cells, but hurdles remain in making the devices durable enough to withstand real-world conditions. A new technique developed by a team of international scientists could simplify the development of efficient and stable perovskite solar cells, named for their unique crystalline structure
Read More
Rachel Balkovec makes baseball history as first female manager thumbnail

Rachel Balkovec makes baseball history as first female manager

New York Rachel Balkovec is aware of the negativity in her social media feeds and tries to leave it there. Her sisters see it, too, and can’t help but pass along certain disparaging reactions to her barrier-breaking journey.“It’s hilarious to me,” Ms. Balkovec said. “Because it’s the American dream.”In the clubhouse? She hasn’t seen any…
Read More
Higher Olive Oil Consumption Linked With Lower Risk of Dying From Heart Disease or Cancer thumbnail

Higher Olive Oil Consumption Linked With Lower Risk of Dying From Heart Disease or Cancer

Replacing margarine, butter, mayonnaise and dairy fat with olive oil was associated with lower mortality risk. Consuming more than 7 grams (>1/2 tablespoon) of olive oil per day is associated with lower risk of cardiovascular disease mortality, cancer mortality, neurodegenerative disease mortality, and respiratory disease mortality, according to a study publishing today (January 10, 2022)…
Read More
ניתן לזהות סימנים מוקדמים לאוטיזם כבר באולטרסאונד טרום לידתי thumbnail

ניתן לזהות סימנים מוקדמים לאוטיזם כבר באולטרסאונד טרום לידתי

כך עולה ממחקר במרכז הלאומי לחקר אוטיזם ונוירו-התפתחות באוניברסיטת בן גוריון והמרכז הרפואי סורוקה ממצאים אנטומיים חריגים במבנה הלב, הכליות, והראש התגלו בבדיקות אולטרסאונד טרום לידתיות שגרתיות בעוברים שפתחו אוטיזם לאחר לידתם. חוקרים מהמרכז הלאומי ע"ש עזריאלי לחקר האוטיזם ונוירו-התפתחות באוניברסיטת בן-גוריון בנגב ומהמרכז הרפואי האוניברסיטאי סורוקה: "ניתן לזהות סימנים מוקדמים לאוטיזם כבר בשליש השני…
Read More
Logan Paul verliert 3,5 Millionen Dollar bei Pokemon-Karten-Betrug thumbnail

Logan Paul verliert 3,5 Millionen Dollar bei Pokemon-Karten-Betrug

© APA/AFP/BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI / BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI Digital Life 14.01.2022 Der umstrittene YouTuber hatte eine Box mit vermeintlich originalverpackten Pokémon-Karten der ersten Edition gekauft. Der umstrittene Social-Media-Star Logan Paul erregt immer wieder mit exzentrischen Aktionen Aufsehen. Im Dezember hatte er für 3,5 Millionen Dollar für eine Box ausgegeben, die "originalverpackte und authentifizierte" Pokemon-Sammelkarten der ersten Edition…
Read More
Index Of News
Total
0
Share